Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 01:35 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB03E3A12C2; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUxLA0EKUBRE; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB3C3A12C0; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id oq3so5393649ejb.7; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OJrJ+V2r+EArwvFW3iMRTLQqz8+PElJkTLq1Yu42i8k=; b=ixk95cioy95Ru3mRfHg0SrkZ9bDf5ZJgJR02yxkmyyfmF7OAhfi5mcOYWVYl0dhlxE 1hmgf4HJjN/H2jsoo1DhL4Ov/LPBrGzNmMWKz8u/pCq/+MnQKGK8NDAD6baT+hF+KBbI MgU0+SIEY8DG5Y2uO/27BV8Ad9rDGmDvQAYvdwqHD/rHln+1rJZ9y4Hl47IBQDiZdlyr 8V3SJ5fg8HvlPeInhvhu48CeS8FlSWoqy+EU1fkJsil5Dv1LMsygA156mO7xweqpkrXz hehDxhPOuQgEuN7vRpjoygDckRkeu2HZAt4ZMJosomCoS4kxb6aYTsGStkbUMMmc/UXT pPRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OJrJ+V2r+EArwvFW3iMRTLQqz8+PElJkTLq1Yu42i8k=; b=SLzfW1MFwKNDaBMOgqBAN9WI6STXwNZP9oUrQePsCncF8svGy8O4AzYwJ19qRf1bly iWg/0QR/wRvqeSt1bi3iFCWhjQO3+gKPRq5ivNqkFyb2NKzVS+U1eyQEV0anon0sgb4t qy0mP++jg8D7/sSFmvIuD4nCCZDNqEOb8NB+aEarozWawood4uw+roNErMsFOH4Ry4ye suxl1d2CWmGK0UddTACGqqUir0EkM6XzPVUrYCva1op+vsC78Y+IC6Jzzfd/De4EniqC OOFS/HXt3gx71kZ9OpYTD7YBXnoVf7TGycgu2jJEUFcVBjh/BJG2tkHCu6a3tZCeHTvE bs3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533W+aHLVHtE3FreeIKxUS0HN5o/0ydHp4HfYw+ZQfmQId+uZRuE cCsV5AywyfhtMWDfLBAr2HsBtQaeHLzc1LgZ3qiIEUsuEa8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgDQ3hnwFRnF/C/Z7ggA2LNQHjKsslEeoLR5p6f1R3ap6YjDLEt0XFwHX37U8nO31SP6QXrzBZkvq28TQNyQs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2805:: with SMTP id eb5mr27753114ejc.27.1605144913664; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:12 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2502.1605136717@localhost>
References: <CAMMESsw9Ryj+aLmhqYu+NwkdQ11BoWxsEfbAvCr8OBk_DwRUGw@mail.gmail.com> <2502.1605136717@localhost> <2502.1605136717@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESszsrCEUaMz79jiKqJTiWhP64bOTyHnoou-_Xz5=q8T2MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064636705b3deece2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/EYv6dJHzZKtH83ghe9ao4oHw7FA>
Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:35:17 -0000
Either way works... On November 11, 2020 at 6:19:11 PM, Michael Richardson ( mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca) wrote: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > [major] The text in §4.3 says that the flags for MOP 7 are reserved > (I'm suggesting unassigned -- but that makes no difference in the > context of this comment), but this text seems to want to pre-define I believe that we got advice from IANA that RESERVED was the right state. It could be changed by an IESG action, such as publishing an IETF Consensus RFC. Unassigned, in theory, leaves IANA free to allocate it to the next document that asks for a MOP value. Of course, in practice, it would come back to the WG, Expert Review, etc. but... -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
- [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrpli… Alvaro Retana