Re: [Roll] [roll] #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 15 October 2013 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0F911E8141 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbfLxOI5A5r6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A5811E813D for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE29A2025A; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 587CD63B88; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBEE63AEF; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <525D69F4.4030204@gridmerge.com>
References: <067.7473226c34e99536104b136c326ce300@trac.tools.ietf.org> <082.0e60a05a9e9a33903054243f518f8668@trac.tools.ietf.org> <13450.1381846273@sandelman.ca> <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA301BE0790@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <5697.1381853285@sandelman.ca> <525D69F4.4030204@gridmerge.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:17:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20078.1381857476@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #132: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:18:22 -0000

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
    > Yes, but your scenario is surely one where it cannot be automatically
    > configured and therefore scope 4 is surely more applicable?

If the RPL can discover/build the network, then the MPL should automatically
use it.  Yes, I agree that I have to plug the cables in, and I probably
have to apply power.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works