Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Mon, 07 May 2012 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=467a60657=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B075E21F8568 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6wEIEVanzaV for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip1mta.uwm.edu (ip1mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74821F8547 for <Roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0EAHWap09/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABEhXKwFwEBBSNWDA8RBAEBAwINGQIeMwgGExmHdQunfoRFhEeJCYEviVCFCIEYBIcTgVGNGowqhBiDBw
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DD72B3F0B; Mon, 7 May 2012 04:50:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7+E2npP8QoIZ; Mon, 7 May 2012 04:50:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0962B3F05; Mon, 7 May 2012 04:50:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 04:50:37 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <1870717185.290349.1336384237471.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9348.1336332502@marajade.sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: Roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:50:39 -0000

Hi Michael

>My suggestion is that the "controversial" values like this SHOULD be
identified more clearly with text akin to:
>Specific consideration of this value MUST be addressed
     in applicability statement(s).
>(I'd even like to put some kind of 2119-like word in about this)

You mean to say that P2P-RPL draft should require the home/building/whomsoever_cares_to_use_p2p_rpl applicability statement to address how to set P2P-RPL trickle parameters?

Thanks
Mukul


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Roll@ietf.org
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, "Mukul Goyal" <mukul@uwm.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2012 2:28:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments


    adrian> Could you enhance the text around the suggested defaults and
    adrian> the guidance to expand a little on what the problems might
    adrian> be, and encourage specific experimentation and reports back
    adrian> to the WG? 

>>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> writes:
    Mukul> Sure I will do that.

I believe we are talking about section 6.1 and 9.2, correct?

My suggestion is that the "controversial" values like this SHOULD be
identified more clearly with text akin to:
     Specific consideration of this value MUST be addressed
     in applicability statement(s).

(I'd even like to put some kind of 2119-like word in about this)

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition.