Re: [Roll] STRONG NUDGE: review draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration

Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp> Mon, 30 June 2014 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE92A1A00B6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7psUpAn3cDa for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp (imx12.toshiba.co.jp [61.202.160.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1EE1A00B2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arc11.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.90.127]) by imx12.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id s5U1wsdU002678 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:54 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by arc11.toshiba.co.jp id s5U1wsm5004434 for roll@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:54 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ovp11.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.90.148] by arc11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id LAA04432; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:54 +0900
Received: from mx2.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id s5U1ws4H009695 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:54 +0900 (JST)
Received: from spiffy21.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id s5U1wr5r010579; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:53 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [133.196.16.134] (ncg-dhcp134.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp [133.196.16.134]) by spiffy21.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AC597D14 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:53 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <53B0C45C.8000705@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:58:52 +0900
From: Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
References: <24486.1403712207@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <24486.1403712207@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/GZAF5vlqUIqZ_rgFmO8vY_zTVco
Subject: Re: [Roll] STRONG NUDGE: review draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:59:03 -0000

Michael, all WG members,

Thanks for attention. I'll update the draft by tomorrow to include minor edits. Anyway core idea will be unchanged. I believe we need to have a control for MPL parameters because it means control over network usage, redundancy/reliability, and end-to-end latency. I really appreciate your comments.

Thanks,

Yusuke



(2014-06-26 01:03), Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> The WG adopted:
>      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration/
>
> in march.  There has been only minor discussion on this document, despite
> there being a reasonable number of people who said they thought this was a
> valuable addition to LLNs, and MPL.
>
> The authors posted a few comments about a question I had: what happens to MPL
> if the parameters are changed, and I think that I'm satisfied.
>
> At this point, it's the WG job to read the document and post questions.
> Even if the protocol is no interest to you, but you've read it, you could say
> so. Clearly if you have an interest in the protocol, and in MPL, please review.
>
> The chairs think that this document may be read for a WGLC, but we do not
> think that there has been enough discussion for us to believe that the
> document has been sufficiently read.
>
> Please comment before IETF90 so we don't have to abandon the work!
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>