IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] some comments on draft-thubert-dao-projection-00.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 06 July 2015 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0C01B29AC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1pL7GCSlDCkP for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4121B29AB for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFD420012 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:23:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 910C363AEC; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDB663AE8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F2C95F1F-7DF2-497E-AFF5-0711565F400C@cisco.com>
References: <20150630063630.9499.53083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849EF25A0@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>, <10398.1436016852@sandelman.ca> <F2C95F1F-7DF2-497E-AFF5-0711565F400C@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:07:34 -0400
Message-ID: <26399.1436141254@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/HBZFZoDFI1cNBXNNF-Cvumw9vzg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] some comments on draft-thubert-dao-projection-00.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:07:37 -0000

> It would be good to make it clear which direction one counts the "segment"
> to know which one is last.  I don't like "segment" here, I think it's
> a routing path...  Could you define segment if you think it's the most
> natural term to use.
> (There are also some articles like "the" missing in places, btw)

I also realized yesterday that 6554/RH3, uses the term segment.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email