[Roll] roll operation dos and don'ts

Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu> Mon, 11 March 2013 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B5521F85D8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTuhrTQn+O51 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1E21F84A9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91B023CAB5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:34:00 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.uh.edu
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spf4jgQ7LxUQ for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:33:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from it.cs.uh.edu (www2.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.6]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FB723CAAF for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:33:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by it.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F152A2809D for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:52:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id eb20so3920473lab.17 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.112.9.10 with SMTP id v10mr4666919lba.47.1363008842257; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.99.38 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:33:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAErDfUSKhcjAks3Fwug+tV+OekqmO_NPvcEX54b9w-tdGh+K_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [Roll] roll operation dos and don'ts
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:34:14 -0000

Dear WG,

As we deploy ROLL, I am sure we have accumulated experiences on
how to make it work great or what not to do. It will be great to
collect that information to benefit everyone. I started a small
attempt at this a while ago. Here is the latest draft:

Recommendations for Efficient Implementation of RPL
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-04

I would like to request everyone to send their experiences and
comments about RPL so I can incorporate them in the next revision of
the document in the next few days.

Thanks.

- om_p