Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"

[Mingui Zhang <[e-mail]>]

I support both.

For F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02

1) When I first read the Abstract, I thought the purpose of this draft is to only enable loose source routing (non-storing mode) down the DODAG. However, after I read the last 4 paragraphs of the Introduction, I realize the protocol extension specified in this draft can also benefit the storing mode.

2) page 10 last paragraph
s/the lest router in the path/the last router in the path/

3) In the paragraph underneath of Figure 5, there is a unfinished sentence.
OLD
   The process recurses till the destination which sends a DAO-ACK to
   the root.  In the example above, for target D, the list of via
   options is S, A, B and C.  The projected DAO is sent by the root to
NEW
   In the example above, the projected DAO is sent by the root to target D.  The list of via
   options is S, A, B and C.  D removes the last Via Option and passes the DAO to C.

4) The paragraph underneath of Figure 6 repeats the previous paragraph.
OLD
   The process recurses till the destination which sends a DAO-ACK to
   the root.  In the example above, for target D, the list of via
   options is S, A, B and C.  The projected DAO is sent by the root to
NEW
   The process recurses till S which sends a DAO-ACK to
   the root.

5) If changes 3) & 4) make sense, the following sentence is to be appended to the last paragraph on page 10.
The process recurses till the first router in the path; the first router sends a DAO-ACK to the root.

6) Underneath Figure 7, some concluding words are needed.

Thanks,
Mingui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 2:50 PM
> To: Roll
> Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - >
> DAO_Projection"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your opinion about
> the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the last set of three
> messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will be asked independently
> dependent on the status of the draft.
> 
> Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
> 
> 
>   F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
>       Root initiated routing state in RPL
> 
> •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
> •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
> •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
> •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> 
>   G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
>         Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
> 
>   •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>   •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
>   •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>   •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
> 
> 
> It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the drafts
> 
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> 
>   Peter and Ines
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll