IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Semantics of DAO ACK

Csaba Kiraly <kiraly@fbk.eu> Thu, 15 October 2015 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kiraly@fbk.eu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B09F1A9141 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUf5hILp9pHz for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com (mail-lf0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA1C1A90EB for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lffv3 with SMTP id v3so32302650lff.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gj3OsmyatIX/7lKdcw4Yh992cYFhgP7JUb9qv/HOcXY=; b=IwYfoVRoW4p11XOd8CcOQN+mbXnSfcpqFv6P7ajyokHjGz5rGADOY1vlr4BGFf1Yke pu8Wgy2AVYLGlOUf9GlnZVQP7VICe2018XyiotxTVvBo78OgXKrmVM88usnZmqkx+K7q /2isugEztJLm2uYOt5/vDrjOEeZyaWigUNNNfB33wtJJoCjSZz4+dpC2mjNLHb0nkC6e 9EtGrWqBnXTk4oD2bkv6MZ8ImaGUVtwSoXqJB70OLGHgxSvlMg3ULKZB3AdrxIZUorZl xVumaYrlP23cyfKx2lfAuHNTCWvdnRZIgDoAKvw+xxMXdqeGUhKkRVnmJ1k1B31Sd4ww gI9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsN9tu5QB9BHroXSpg89JyRpPn3MOgMiA8ZKFxl+ogh1BekR6iEHdB6xcaMVs/I+Ptba3qd0IUkRdtTfCEiJcQN2ORW4Po09RhiXEwP5hByd/YupheCJR9/SWiCjTunW73QGdoGvPMnitP8EwKEIx2RU3iyVz5cIB1kySoR3pWuuAyASE=
X-Received: by 10.180.184.232 with SMTP id ex8mr11198038wic.15.1444922577575; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cskiralys-MacBook-Air.local ([217.77.82.234]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm11837916wif.11.2015.10.15.08.22.56 for <roll@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: roll@ietf.org
References: <DB5PR01MB10807DAF503BBFF45787599C80420@DB5PR01MB1080.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <6d21d0f86ab14ae7a99ff9fe6873b1fd@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <C885EE62-D889-4229-9CCB-B3CB540F5692@sics.se> <560AFDBB.8050505@gmail.com> <560B68B2.6030501@fbk.eu> <561FC22C.6000000@sandelman.ca>
From: Csaba Kiraly <kiraly@fbk.eu>
Message-ID: <561FC4CD.4040508@fbk.eu>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:22:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <561FC22C.6000000@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/HgwmiW7RF89h2IWgxQYFg9FtbVE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Semantics of DAO ACK
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:23:02 -0000


On 15/10/15 17:11, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> On 09/30/15 00:44, Csaba Kiraly wrote:
>> What Cenk is saying sounds a reasonable hack, but the standard itself 
>> is in my opinion a bit underspecified for the semantics of DAO-ACK 
>> messages in several ways.
>
> A document which updated RFC6550 would be welcome here.

I could extend my previous summary into a more proper document, but I 
have no experience with RFC writing, so I would prefer to team up with 
someone who is more knowledgeable in the writing style. Anyone willing 
to help?

Csaba

>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email