Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Sat, 05 May 2012 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=4655d8005=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB15D21F84D6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16TFQSDTf1p8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip1mta.uwm.edu (ip1mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353F121F84AF for <Roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAHxmpU9/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABFhXKwFQEBAQMBAQEBIEsLBQcPDgMEAQEDAg0ZAikoCAYTiAkFC6dDiRqJBQSBL4lQhQiBGASIZI0akEKDBw
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBF81FD0C7; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:44:09 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fSSin7ios1V0; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:44:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A9E1FD0A9; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:44:09 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 12:44:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Federico Consoli <admin@ipv6it.org>
Message-ID: <643639228.281047.1336239849113.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4FA562FF.5090909@ipv6it.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: Roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 17:44:10 -0000

I have no further comment to make. I think we disgree on this point.

Thanks
Mukul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Federico Consoli" <admin@ipv6it.org>
To: "Mukul Goyal" <mukul@uwm.edu>
Cc: Roll@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2012 12:27:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments

Il 05/05/2012 19.18, Mukul Goyal ha scritto:
>> [Mukul2]
>> You described two separate scenarios:
>> 1) A has 15 neighbors, B has just A as the neighbor.
>> 2) Both A and B have 15 neighbors including each other.
>>
>> In the second scenario, K=1 definitely makes sense because there are many candidate paths and one such path to B would probably be discovered even though many of B's neighbors would end up suppressing their DIOs. It is possible that the discovered route wont pass through A.
> [Federico3]
> I think this is the problem, the fact that the node B does not have full
> information about the status of his neighborhood. In the second scenario
> node B will use a path almost certainly worse to reach a neighbor of the
> node A.
>
> [Mukul3]
> IMHO, there is no problem. There is no need for B to know the route through each neighbor. All it needs to know is one path that meets the constraints specified by the origin. The need to avoid too many DIO transmissions is critical and K in default configuration option is set to reflect this priority.
[Federico4]
Yes but the information about the route through each neighbor is very 
important for the objective function.

> Thanks
> Mukul
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll


-- 
Regards
Consoli Federico