Re: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Mon, 19 September 2016 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECF12B2B9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZXfAL7fTRsQ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22d.google.com (mail-yb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A55112B2B8 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x93so81341774ybh.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=8q8V9bpKIXTqWEfD7eJtzR/C4Z0cseo6ILQK8qVKpuo=; b=AZhntL1pm4KKaclXRnIXK9XNDWkCbLjDHonOs2jLKHGvtoctOOMWhnvcWVsCQwSCao GyvSajYWbGfOdnTm29wNnu8s95mUQFhcjCafrR6J6jI//mfvJvUdfF+VbE7ZecmMGhEE Sj9TkIRWZiyOKwzLYsc2+3FRioly8MnP0ZTJgTW/qwr8qd26jYrQ/M4Vl18jTMI85Xif g8VEamJY5V0QYFqx1XGaJcqH/oYmLdtk5+Os+MNoGdMlEH1T0PwajH82hj0hllxxWdqx LQCE8jjHHSkABVGK8mQl8L5h0X1KFg1MvFxn+IAWxBk+3X+BpZeZGpKUkdNTKKsGohcS +BRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8q8V9bpKIXTqWEfD7eJtzR/C4Z0cseo6ILQK8qVKpuo=; b=bKwWrNa4mdq7mzl9XpD1ltExw0732FiOaGORVrpd+GSeZ+rILJEHN6NcP2dsGlINhs ZyRdp3zVyG4BlPDYFHkI7nzirLKvvILr23CTS65lgn+EIZOd/IRAtfBE9oUVSJzKx3nv AbKeTQ0xJbsDU9rG2g+aYX9tN8zqTT1epUDh/4WVkge8fZecxGreUEQ/D1lBd7OF341H q5qq5JhsbF3/83m7DjodbQbsXw1AJgRJJk1pE+Vuyzocu4kWCyqskdWGWBqwM9nxP+q7 ENmsK9wf0veFXqoEwW89A72OspzHN5TNR0z2nyj/ozPzd+BoCpfyzKTlAtPxBZpbspwg uhXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPJnnMT7KD6vUwjdxsxqxsXTa2rsG5U5l8fB4H62y4e/igHGqwwaJxUMYsUERxTFRMoXgDWPO6kkZxiaw==
X-Received: by 10.37.85.134 with SMTP id j128mr25314747ybb.71.1474279622359; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.176.1.113 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJpB70BD=41kU6VqNtS5=h19Jje9Nwkt5-izfJ364tiJDJTaSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <86972780d65c4f893678ee6963d89b7a@xs4all.nl> <CAJpB70BD=41kU6VqNtS5=h19Jje9Nwkt5-izfJ364tiJDJTaSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:06:41 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yeDfscsH_mjLf-9I52NDsM7WFPU
Message-ID: <CANK0pbbJ1aEgbZpG73QY4FO2tcgAqZeOCiqo27DvRe8MM6pvcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144f6ec30c557053cd979bf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/HzTwnHn5phF0Bf-ywOj18sO5sN8>
Subject: Re: [Roll] last call for roll charter text.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:07:06 -0000

Hi everyone,
I also support the charter.
A comment: should we consider mentioning explicitly the standards-track
version of the P2P-RPL, as suggested by Pascal during the meeting in Berlin?
Best,
Emmanuel

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:51 AM, satish anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I support the current charter and proposed milestones.
>
> With Regards,
> Satish.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:53 PM, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>;
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Below the text for the ROLL charter as discussed in Berlin and on the
>> mailing list.
>> The last additions are the milestones based on the feedback of the past
>> months.
>>
>> Many thanks for all your contributions. The text is shorter and clearer
>> in my opinion.
>>
>> Please react to (approve) the text, and review the milestone dates when
>> they concern your work.
>>
>> End of call: Saturday October 1.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Peter + Ines
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ____________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Charter for ROLL Working Group
>>
>> Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs ) are made up of many embedded devices
>> with limited power, memory, and processing resources. They are
>> interconnected by a variety of links, such as IEEE 802.15.4, Bluetooth, Low
>> Power WiFi, wired or other low power PLC (Powerline Communication) links.
>> LLNs are transitioning to an end-to-end IP-based solution to avoid the
>> problem of non-interoperable networks interconnected by protocol
>> translation gateways and proxies.
>>
>> RFC7102 discusses ROLL specific aspects of LLNs, and RFC7228 provides
>> additional terminology for constrained devices.
>>
>> RFC 5548, 5673, 5826, and 5876 describe the requirements for LLNs from
>> several application perspectives.
>> The Working Group has focused on routing solutions for the areas:
>> connected home, building, and urban sensor networks. It has developed a
>> Framework that takes into consideration various aspects including high
>> reliability in the presence of time varying loss characteristics and
>> connectivity while permitting low-power operation with very modest memory
>> and CPU pressure in networks potentially comprising a very large number
>> (several thousands) of nodes.
>>
>> The Working Group continues to focus on routing issues for LLN and to
>> maintain, improve and streamline the protocols developed by the working
>> group, including RPL and MPL.
>>
>> ROLL will coordinate closely with the working groups in other areas that
>> focus on constrained networks and/or constrained nodes, such as 6lo (Int)
>> and lwig (Int) and CoRE (App). The working groups PiM (rtg), BIER (rtg) and
>> MANET (rtg) will be consulted when ROLL work can profit from their results.
>> The Working group will align with the 6man (Int) WG when needed.
>>
>> Work Items are:
>>
>> - Guidance in using RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation. The
>> WGLC on this work will be shared with 6lo.
>>
>> - Compression of  RFC6553, RFC6554, and IP headers in the 6LoWPAN
>> adaptation layer context. (coordinated with 6lo WG).
>>
>> - Additional protocol elements to reduce packet size and the amount of
>> required routing states
>>
>> - Automatic selection of MPL forwarders to reduce message replication.
>> (coordinated with PiM wg)
>>
>> - Data models for RPL and MPL management (coordinated with netmod and PiM
>> wg)
>>
>> - Alternative Multicast algorithm see for example Bier forwarding.
>> (coordinated with PiM wg and relateds wg, e.g. BIER)
>>
>> - Methods to improve or correct the current RPL behavior and the other
>> protocols defined by the working group.
>>
>> - Alternative Routing mechanism for constrained environments see for
>> example AODV-RPL
>>
>>
>> Milestones
>>
>> DATE                            Milestone
>> September 2018            Recharter WG or close
>> July 2018       Initial submission of a solution for
>> draft-jadhav-roll-no-path-dao-ps to IESG
>> November 2017   Initial submission of draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl to IESG
>> November 2017   Initial submission of draft-gundogan-roll-dis-modifications
>> to IESG
>> July 2017        Initial submission of draft-bergmann-bier-ccast to IESG
>> July 2017         Initial submission of draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-forw-select
>> to IESG
>> March 2017      Initial submission of draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-yang to
>> IESG
>> March 2017      Initial submission of draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection
>> to IESG
>> November 2016             Initial Submission of the draft about when to
>> use RFC6553, RFC6554, and IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation
>> Draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo to the IESG.
>> November 2016            IESG Evaluation of draft-roll-routing-dispatch.
>>
>> --
>> Peter van der Stok
>> vanderstok consultancy
>> mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org
>> www: www.vanderstok.org
>> tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *With Regards,*
>
>
>
> *Dr. Satish Anamalamudi, PhD.,Research Engineer, Huawei Networking
> Research Laboratory,Beijing, China.*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>