IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sun, 12 April 2020 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780763A0E6B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=R8AqQzCi; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=VUu7JGWj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-nDFbVdWb-o for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D75C3A0E6A for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1840; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586705699; x=1587915299; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BWavMK5DTc3ddUotND6t5NuI3w2i1wXfcg00MgMx960=; b=R8AqQzCi6kdXl1GDknr34sdHqSAkumdlunBNV0se83xSWSwQeGLHqTDZ Y9uuF3rlozR4OMtZ6QY/38ToWYFtQd0/B2G8/6DB65qKDsEmFnja8kcQ6 R32TBCyjzWTpl7aH0S0zOboFDuhrPTrHPCoax4SrIhRCQMDZqYtweUZYe 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:tssAwx/SQc1F9v9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVdaZCVDxIeT2Ryc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DIBwBCNJNe/4QNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVCQsBWxYIAQLKoQcg0YDimdOgWwlmCOCUgNUCgEBAQwBARgLCgIEAQGERAIXgXkkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQECAQEBEBERDAEBLAwECwIBCBoCJgICAiULFRACBBMign8EAQGCSwMOIAECDKQCAoE5iGJ1gTKCfwEBBYUFGIIOAwaBDiqCYoJChxEagUE/gREnDBCCTT6CZwEBgWWDEjKCLJEXoD0KgkGXTx2cJqwZAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIg2BSnAVOyoBgj5QGA2NI4NzhRSFQXSBKY4vAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,374,1580774400"; d="scan'208";a="745149555"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 12 Apr 2020 15:34:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03CFYv6i001626 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:34:57 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:34:57 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:34:57 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:34:57 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=goBMV0bymIYKv3MG1Gp23T15Kcdo/Tq9Ki3WhTxaR0OpHeOFpRumVYkb5XXABR9eQJ/GCeH2mDpxUPP7nciwGSWk1NjhJslSzkF4pn+poZhYQdufxXR8F4P+XLdaxRQX46K7lnh7U0SHxO50XXrXCroSYMQa2bMqgaDmmn5N4BezQ6rjR0LzTrpF7r3pKGG5e/DxGzHzgLo2SS8tqVbvP9HyuSIVr0B2v9nMJpTUc2MeNxA3+8vr/bOxCekPLASYXRk9TZ+mkoA73zmG9IbpAlixwccQt8syGWtnoAbd0l9eMXBLHm5ezyyNQlEjF/rvxb1o+n19Frgckv7NBqkcvw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BWavMK5DTc3ddUotND6t5NuI3w2i1wXfcg00MgMx960=; b=dHvoZbnRmSNnHwo55OcL6YdNpkI34y+47H4qZcVXBgQcYeBaZEwWdbGip1eT92ZJbXwBeYDBd/tOJlZy2/inbjKjiyGBvPFHXhmMzlxPM81A1bzDAkdrC2OWvJQgXSaDSqGlnkDyHsReaUCmJSTMGRATyBZ5UIyxA6wm5pfnLLLkwH1ZbDxpYIikbb1IEbOBEXzagDCupxys23P2qH4E3kaE84YbK96CLnLGZ6u+ISRt42neRRFCZtoBxSb3MUK4P52ugECd9qL17QKPeveJO8dSOAj1a1q5zbLoF25LMgIJ0fIezlSPozt3GrZvUuPHJxwFBV791HmwB0gnAFaPCA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BWavMK5DTc3ddUotND6t5NuI3w2i1wXfcg00MgMx960=; b=VUu7JGWjqZj8oAOCd4BxIfhkkXfkm0Fj+Jdic4VLhTCKkZS5jcqXZFCL78yHWRWqOePAIbbRPK8jWkStw2nHE/xGGrMxprqQIOpVxiIyxTC9szeQy9KDCZOzAlK9noN1yya0XbGNGIFvy5rhYCEoN079BsT7nn7hs2v3dNd1iNE=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB3934.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.16; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:34:55 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.028; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:34:55 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13
Thread-Index: AQHV/Ro9AOfHATbWbk+HyMb2raYz4qhtjAx3gAFYroCAAglh4IABNtCAgAAAwqCAAg64AIAAEJYDgADhqICAAJ79uQ==
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:34:55 +0000
Message-ID: <16E40B89-3E69-4468-9830-C51A596FF7EE@cisco.com>
References: <CAP+sJUe7oF74F96zi5RuE985CD9LzNfwad=Zzstc8uat2wc3aQ@mail.gmail.com> <25495_1585151124_5E7B7C94_25495_267_1_DAA13A41.7291B%dominique.barthel@orange.com> <CAP+sJUchX+q_cX4_fOytz+q5RfjN+L51VM-+Auz4jVxK-6wpOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO0Djp1QGASEu4fasZD6K6CSD0q-7F+CD0_JOOppWnnABdbo5w@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35650537494AB9FB8E0849D1D8C10@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAO0Djp1-SYaYGwpdBsUbK07_HPN=Had_MqJidXfPg1fBM4wHPg@mail.gmail.com>, <MN2PR11MB3565A72C53705EEF21DAD237D8DF0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <BM1PR01MB40208D80481AD0AEC7F9746FA9DF0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <91157D69-4945-4FFD-A221-14702DA03868@cisco.com>, <BM1PR01MB402002EB400323452E83EC3CA9DC0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BM1PR01MB402002EB400323452E83EC3CA9DC0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:1c81:8113:1a5d:3681]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b47a15b9-0756-4f6a-297b-08d7def70d5a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3934:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3934B53310EF26A5D58411F1D8DC0@MN2PR11MB3934.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0371762FE7
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(33656002)(186003)(2616005)(8936002)(71200400001)(81156014)(8676002)(2906002)(66574012)(86362001)(36756003)(6916009)(66446008)(66946007)(76116006)(91956017)(6486002)(64756008)(66476007)(6512007)(316002)(6506007)(66556008)(478600001)(966005)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: ncEBjuLKSG/a0RKH2gWG+o88rAbOzNsZwzqBqH/g2hc8GdFi8dRhgptDKhQbN1r2vpyaDs7U3bUaWUum/qLqbRM0yxBpjLrDwobzBuzw3McJHkKDyJHLB7vdinFXQSCCv8/KCDaGCx3NtR0KxIe30fPpF7NSfz299LWq6LF/3FE0YYgVqGy4VTaHYZ0HPB4Q+bvgm042aq6zUz1fhtrbTA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b47a15b9-0756-4f6a-297b-08d7def70d5a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Apr 2020 15:34:55.7086 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xRqknazV7bgMt4bQEtN2uLb5SoYoquclWXoDUOnAWfX3rWCQBA2d8+ytq8kzF/8RmPKlxNyltev7uBW6+XdGLw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3934
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/I1y8NyoTBe9Krfp7-LoYbXDru_E>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:35:02 -0000

Hello Rahul 

That’s interesting because the 6LR would not know that a parent erased the ROVR. So it’s probably safer to send the EDAR upon a termination NS AERO.

OTOH that EDAR may collision with another if the node moved. RFC 8505 has text for that.

What do you think?

Pascal

> Le 12 avr. 2020 à 08:06, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> a écrit :
> 
> 
> Yes that was the proposal and yes the cost is high. Maybe we could MUST a knob to turn it on if it is not always?
> 
> [RJ] Agree, conditionally will be better. One more thing that I realized that intermediate 6LRs won't be able to generate a DAO with the ROVR when they generate it by themselves i.e., on parent-switch, ... unless they maintain ROVR in the routing entry context. Is this the case?
> Another thing to consider for backward compatibility, in storing MOP the intermediate 6LRs who do not support this draft may just zero out the ROVRsz and the ROVR field depending on how the implementation is done. For e.g., contiki-ng just forwards the DAO based on the downstream input DAO and won't have an issue but any other implementation which generates the DAO locally based on routing entry will have an issue.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email