IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology

"Gillmore, Matthew" <Matthew.Gillmore@itron.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Matthew.Gillmore@itron.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5761A045B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:17:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.255
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.255 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fL72GYB98i3P for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0239.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.239]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE491A0009 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR04MB554.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.17) by CO1PR04MB459.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.878.16; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:44 +0000
Received: from CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.12) by CO1PR04MB554.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.878.16; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:42 +0000
Received: from CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.138]) by CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.138]) with mapi id 15.00.0878.008; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:42 +0000
From: "Gillmore, Matthew" <Matthew.Gillmore@itron.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology
Thread-Index: AQHPJ2Dvptn9QlHnBEGPMHibJ6EWMJqyGFOAgAFcPgCAADMfAIAAG23w
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:42 +0000
Message-ID: <efd095b3f3334f728460c3de06b88060@CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <30140.1392147480@sandelman.ca> <61C053F3-F4FE-41FC-804A-184184660F2F@tzi.org> <19014.1392312790@sandelman.ca> <B553DE17-9AED-45D1-ABA6-7842F6F8CD8F@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B553DE17-9AED-45D1-ABA6-7842F6F8CD8F@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [38.121.36.2]
x-forefront-prvs: 0121F24F22
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(6009001)(13464003)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(81342001)(90146001)(65816001)(2656002)(92566001)(86362001)(81542001)(56816005)(81816001)(81686001)(85852003)(83072002)(66066001)(80022001)(93136001)(33646001)(94946001)(93516002)(79102001)(63696002)(74706001)(83322001)(74366001)(80976001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(77096001)(4396001)(76796001)(31966008)(85306002)(47446002)(74502001)(74662001)(69226001)(87266001)(76576001)(47736001)(49866001)(47976001)(76786001)(50986001)(59766001)(95416001)(53806001)(77982001)(46102001)(51856001)(74876001)(87936001)(54356001)(95666001)(76482001)(15975445006)(54316002)(74316001)(94316002)(56776001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR04MB554; H:CO1PR04MB553.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:38.121.36.2; FPR:B428C175.9F3797DA.91FCBD7B.4261DE61.20287; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: itron.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ILPn0kA0SiXLZXjc8YQru4KOGxw
Cc: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, "draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:51 -0000

I agree with Carsten,  a solution for a hybrid of storing mode and non-storing mode is very interesting.




Matthew Gillmore
Strategic Standards Architect, Office of the CTO
Mobile: +1.517.745.7350
Knowledge to Shape Your Future
      



-----Original Message-----
From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:36 PM
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Cc: Ines Robles; draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in mixed network topology

Well,

> The metering people (AMI) specified storing mode in the applicability 
> statement.  Traffic distance doesn't matter as it's almost all p2mp.

It's easy to "leave the door open" in an applicability statement.
(BTW, is that document alive?  I haven't been paying attention.)

I would be more interested in hearing about people who actually build things that way.

> I understand your statement to be disinterest in new partial storing modes.

No, I find the problem intriguing.  It just seems to me that storing mode isn't actually being used outside research.
If a hybrid mode could make the introduction of storing nodes a more useful proposition, that would be an interesting result of this work.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email