[Roll] term for async msg - storing-rootack
Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24 UTC
Return-Path: <nyrahul@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE93A0404 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 23:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDeweKvR88FT for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 23:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C003A0400 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2020 23:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=alYuJ3s1n5GIO4xH9El+WgQLxdBQGtO/o243PLLLD3ZjS+t+sDPjKEhw5M++juuYLJr+2XRm5TaJ5Np1GpVaA8Top+wyK4d7wURuyq7GMNLOVOWQkkZ9u6uAIcvcjB3xd7hie+Ex7N01AVU2NHeO8iVxXGnhGX5oaLFeanUHilI81flIjWDuAOMeaW/c3cjYn1QhhFT9S2HeLCVTuYNxW/bTxRYDxc2T91W4XboZVR9S70CMGPxM+FDH+G/FHuePWadC6WOb5ZLwvdHf6o/TNzq4S/YoqJ/BJI9J6hZ8EEJ53tdLyl4kdSRosU9Y3sT+JTHKpPbQP7LjS5du1ApuDg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Q7euSnvBvgQJ+BkWdM+vlVYRncf2eDnK6GBUBBL/m/I=; b=OBBubwjpVjlpS9n4yyMkXBRsgrqet1sh280vsAkZ+5p1DtBxQwSih7NVcbzATGfBVuaP3S2GNVW+SUJje6XrLJgyqQ9sB4Jii39TmCpAVro6huS289viacrDxAl3SEoDBEyL9pqwmGg30OOgId+6Fp35JViF344HTqo7oyC9QykeJcj9fSiapT6GccTpHHuJdINGQbfYLVKvftq2TjRrmoG+selFqvu6NPB9USDfP2trmS/zkaerf248I53bSJZXpUTARaEr+f2hxvsh3AQ70QMsXeytMJcpWKiUAo1BMFpGUFyMBEfsb4KnHASODp5+vfqBnkOXyT+yX14EAZOgXQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Q7euSnvBvgQJ+BkWdM+vlVYRncf2eDnK6GBUBBL/m/I=; b=bzNf4o9p31PzhqoRBUT3suqgs/2+c3j8Kp1Hl8FFFsivMpJT+Mb0/MFdUw4CxKskNqBtr2STaYnsN8xQq6ayeN2nRkBAaJfVMUih//VQHoGFtIpCuauikwe0KQNhnihIxspGmX4y43Cve9MjT6jUzni6M1rZ2twS+pstihyvokL4Tv42qEvu9WXXMQ5gJYiSoUZ51CNdrKQHxntjQxmQSL40x16f5OhALQ0zMkzBM+UT0HjFgOLyOoEd9yWrKMxGru7mpSIrHGL63DqZFRlYmGXEJveMTBuSlGQeF6/ax15zf2AFIOZKryiZ8utb1cKNYNQAogPMFqccQUkga3DENA==
Received: from PU1APC01FT042.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::44) by PU1APC01HT212.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebe::157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23; Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24:08 +0000
Received: from BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.252.51) by PU1APC01FT042.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.253.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24:08 +0000
Received: from BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::6174:ad1b:55:41be]) by BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::6174:ad1b:55:41be%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.020; Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24:08 +0000
From: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: term for async msg - storing-rootack
Thread-Index: AQHWLzY9XhGoqjVWd0eZK9P4fmVklQ==
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24:08 +0000
Message-ID: <BM1PR01MB40204DF7ED2661CDB4C4B267A9B70@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US
Content-Language: en-IN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:8095D0834B094EBBC613A7DD81DEE1507AC01B95A87A03D783B93DDD1062819A; UpperCasedChecksum:A55683D095F46049BAE680EB2E6E95DDDBD4C7E2760B684837A51B4AD948C73D; SizeAsReceived:6667; Count:42
x-tmn: [HCxGS3a+5L/qVRctl/Czfc4gl+OOEPRV]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b1a15c33-aa49-4588-3235-08d7fd4f919b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PU1APC01HT212:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 7qZvfmtknuFZ4mNEEokcSHnrkvfchVrmMjmcvxVeKwj4V6TSUZt1T/1BROvy6MUOLpQTXX/PLJJykUHnxHDfLrD8x/gJS0eqka69P4ASOEDZLDlO8nV8w58W/Bp5pfh2jhcCIFz+kMAwYjmLAa/pxhav5hJqjxfaT6HLfTSA5uat6ZyrQRCsTJl/kZZOi5fU6K3uX9auLuIJpjYNf3UgzQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: xJ1upAGr8uQVWDZuT+S+n4iVOSoSjAOsQmSf7RF/RP9iJgWa+ibjNMgMObspQzz7rsWdEBArBvIB+kWi7vCaMJ13D2m5uveymLDAtxYqLHE5NLThdYVuUSP3AUgCh64IXp06GMr4UQMvi7+rRYppvw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BM1PR01MB40204DF7ED2661CDB4C4B267A9B70BM1PR01MB4020INDP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b1a15c33-aa49-4588-3235-08d7fd4f919b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 May 2020 06:24:08.2805 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1APC01HT212
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/WoSp2uKZHetiZ0BqMyNRNA3BHrk>
Subject: [Roll] term for async msg - storing-rootack
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 06:24:12 -0000
Hello All, This is about using an appropriate name/term for the message sent from root to the node. The draft targets this msg as an indication for e2e path establishment for the node. However, this primitive will be useful for capability query/indication. In storing MOP this will be the only message which is directly addressed to the node from the root. Currently, the draft calls it DAO-ACK and is not a good term. Another term that is suggested is RootACK. Shall we call it an ACK at all? RPL-Ping is another term. Suggestions are welcome. Hoping to use the term finalized here in the interim slides. Thanks, Rahul
- Re: [Roll] term for async msg - storing-rootack Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Roll] term for async msg - storing-rootack Rahul Jadhav