Re: [Roll] RPL implementation

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 21 January 2015 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8031A1B49 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPwxSMeNytax for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D131A1B5D for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074FA2009E for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:52:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 56307637FE; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC00637F4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B2BCA4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B2BCA4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:00 -0500
Message-ID: <23607.1421862360@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/JWhHpwbL2Qf8U2A5xetpDtw1shw>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL implementation
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:46:13 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > I'm curious about the progress of the protocol inside and outside LLN domains.
    > Do we have a status on current RPL implementations overall?
    > In particular, do we have opensource outside pure LLN devices, e.g. a
    > generic linux implementation to play with?

http://unstrung.sandelman.ca/ is an implementation for openwrt and smartphone
class devices running Linux; it doesn't speak 6lowpan specifically; but some
people have made it work with an not-yet-released linux device that had 802.15.4.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-