[Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 27 June 2019 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3AA1200E6; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, roll-chairs@ietf.org, consultancy@vanderstok.org, roll@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <156160670770.20102.6856258611522333962.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:38:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/JhyvHdXfKf9znnYyjtCdRkROWSs>
Subject: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 03:38:28 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 4.3

"A new ICMPv6 RPL control message type"

Shouldn't this be "code" instead of "type" given that the RPL control message
types are ICMPv6 codes?