[Roll] acceptance of individual drafts
Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Tue, 17 July 2018 18:25 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780CD130EF3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVFIgP7do3nG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0222.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D269131001 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA23837F24C for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Spam-Summary: 50, 0, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, stokcons@bbhmail.nl, :, RULES_HIT:41:72:152:355:379:582:800:962:967:973:983:988:989:1152:1189:1208:1221:1260:1263:1313:1314:1345:1381:1431:1436:1437:1516:1517:1518:1534:1541:1575:1588:1589:1592:1594:1711:1730:1776:1792:2525:2561:2564:2682:2685:2693:2829:2859:2911:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3586:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:4321:4362:4425:4659:5007:6119:6261:6298:6659:8603:9010:9015:9025:9177:9388:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12295:12555:12679:12895:12986:13071:13139:13161:13199:13210:13229:13439:13846:14096:14180:14181:14195:14721:21060:21063:21080:21324:21433:21451:21625:21691:21740:30006:30041:30048:30054:30070, 0, RBL:216.40.42.5:@bbhmail.nl:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.8.55.100 66.201.201.201, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:fn, MSBL:0, DNSBL:neutral, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LF
X-HE-Tag: class03_8437264a59b34
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4435
Received: from mail.bbhmail.nl (imap-ext [216.40.42.5]) (Authenticated sender: webmail@stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_7c567f0ae4e5ed9a8234ab392b9f8a26"
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:25:08 -0400
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <22116446e1239aadd9ccc0c7b6d546ca@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.7
X-Originating-IP: [31.133.147.176]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/JjALBF74L32eESYezqCyrw241pE>
Subject: [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:25:13 -0000
Hi Roll, This morning we had several interesting presentations of individual drafts. They all fit within the charter of ROLL, and represent worthy subjects. It would be pleasure to take them in as roll WG documents, provided there is enough interest in the WG to work on the subjects. Below there is a list of drafts for which I like an answer to the following questions: Did you read a version of the document, Do you intend to read a version of the document. Will you react on the ML concerning the document. Are you willing to do a review of the document? Will you contribute to the document? Answering to only one question positively for a subset of the documents is probably sufficient to gauge interest. The list of drafts is: Bier RPL design team document rahul-roll-rpl-observation koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-estension ji-roll-traffic-aware-objective function thubert-roll-unaware-leaves For draft rahul-rpl-observation, the consideration that it should go to RFC is no relevant for these questions, because we can use the document extensively in the WG without publishing it in the end. Thanks for your reactions and contributions. Peter&Ines -- Peter van der Stok vanderstok consultancy mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org www: www.vanderstok.org [1] tel NL: +31(0)492474673 F: +33(0)966015248 Links: ------ [1] http://www.vanderstok.org
- [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts Peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts Michael Richardson