IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] proposed amendments to ROLL charter

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234CA1A036E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 02:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRFXGjcRt511 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscan1.extendcp.co.uk (mailscan6.extendcp.co.uk [79.170.43.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C18B1A037A for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscanlb0.hi.local ([10.0.44.160] helo=mailscan2.hi.local) by mailscan-g64.hi.local with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>) id 1Ycs7B-0004cM-4L; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:05:41 +0100
Received: from mailscanlb0.hi.local ([10.0.44.160] helo=mail41.extendcp.co.uk) by mailscan2.hi.local with esmtps (UNKNOWN:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>) id 1Ycs79-0006xr-4C; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:05:41 +0100
Received: from host86-156-208-9.range86-156.btcentralplus.com ([86.156.208.9] helo=[192.168.0.6]) by mail41.extendcp.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) id 1Ycs74-0006d4-Du; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:05:34 +0100
Message-ID: <551A6358.4010003@gridmerge.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:05:28 +0100
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
Organization: Gridmerge Ltd.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
References: <30526.1427136071@sandelman.ca> <10807.1427243740@sandelman.ca> <11436.1427750888@sandelman.ca> <551A4FDF.4040000@gridmerge.com> <CADJ9OA8dsWAULGGMdB80tqUp=mNK-L0JZbB62vB7j00P3_LwMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA8dsWAULGGMdB80tqUp=mNK-L0JZbB62vB7j00P3_LwMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010703030404050006080102"
X-Authenticated-As: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
X-Extend-Src: mailout
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/JtD_X6qBC7ejCpPOU4pYmAv0MBQ>
Subject: Re: [Roll] proposed amendments to ROLL charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:05:45 -0000

Er yes, apologies for the poor editing!

Robert

On 31/03/2015 08:45, Thomas Watteyne wrote:
> Robert,
>
>     Change "IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation" to "IPIP encapsulation"
>
>
> Do you mean the reverse?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Robert Cragie 
> <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com <mailto:robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hope I'm not too late...
>
>     I support the charter update. Just a couple of suggestions:
>
>     * Change "IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation" to "IPIP encapsulation" as
>     also suggested by Thomas. AFAICT "IPIP" is not widely used and
>     when it is, it refers more to IPv4.
>     * Change "in the 6lowpan HC context" to "in the 6LoWPAN adaptation
>     layer context". This generalises it to include dispatch-based
>     solutions as well, otherwise it could be read as only looking at
>     NHC-based variants.
>
>     Robert
>
>
>     On 30/03/2015 22:28, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>     Michael Richardson<mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>  <mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>  wrote:
>>          > The charter discussion will remain open until March 30. This will put
>>          > it on the telechat for April 9.
>>
>>     Last change to say something + or - about this charter update.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Roll mailing list
>>     Roll@ietf.org  <mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Roll mailing list
>     Roll@ietf.org <mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email