Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update

[Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>]

Dear JP,

Sounds quite reasonable.

Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...

Best,

Thomas

On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
> 
> Plan is:
> * Close on the last open ticket
> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
> 
> Thanks, have a good week-end.
> 
> JP.
> 
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
>> Hi Thomas,
>> 
>> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>> 
>> Cheers.
>> 
>> JP.
>> 
>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello folks,
>>> 
>>> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
>>> 
>>> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
>>> 
>>> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Thomas
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Thomas Heide Clausen
>>> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>>> 
>>> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
>>> discuss it."
>>>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>