IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [roll] #105: trickle-mcast: how to determine scope of MPL domain

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 12 November 2012 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429A721F866B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ci5EVNxWNA0W for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA11321F860F for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.134]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8ACE81A9; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:08:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3114CA0BC; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:07:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-reply-to: <109e9168af966b0ee543f13886fef7ef@xs4all.nl>
References: <058.e817419e990e1afb26be9aa25d5cfc21@trac.tools.ietf.org> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF0F6EFA99@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <50932647.3050509@exegin.com> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF0F6F2837@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <5094202F.4010805@exegin.com> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF0F6F874A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <509C03C2.50809@exegin.com> <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF0F714CBF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <509C5F00.2050204@exegin.com> <109e9168af966b0ee543f13886fef7ef@xs4all.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> message dated "Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:23:48 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:07:40 -0500
Message-ID: <8796.1352758060@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #105: trickle-mcast: how to determine scope of MPL domain
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:17:36 -0000

splitting up your text to emphasize a few things:

>>>>> "peter" == peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> writes:
    peter> The nodes in all networks use the same communication channel.

...

    peter> not forward the message.  In this network configuration the
    peter> dissemination area is identical with a network.  From a cost
    peter> perspective (less border routers) it is more realistic if one
    peter> network covers the whole floor. 

But, in your diagram, you have 6 border routers?!?

I don't understand why nodes in area1 and area2 should use the same
communication channel.  

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email