Re: [Roll] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-17: (with COMMENT)

sorry, that comment is left over from the original ballot.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:34 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello Martin:
>
> MOP 7 is not added by this document but by useofrplinfo. This is why we do
> not update it here.
> Please see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-41#section-4.3
>
> I'm reluctant applying the change you propose. Considering the above it
> seems misleading.
> Also it took a a lot of effort from multiple persons (Alvaro leading) to
> craft that particular sentence.
> We seem to have reached a difficult consensus.
>
> Take care
>
> Pascal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Martin Duke via
> Datatracker
> > Sent: mercredi 11 novembre 2020 17:41
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org; roll@ietf.org; mariainesrobles@googlemail.com;
> > draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Roll] Martin Duke's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-
> > 17: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-17: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.
> >
> > I found last paragraph of Section 3 confusing. I suggest the following
> change:
> >
> > OLD:
> > Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in the
> > DIO Base Object. This specification applies to MOP values 0 to 6. For a
> MOP
> > value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default regardless of the
> setting
> > of the "T" flag.
> >
> > NEW:
> > "Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in
> the
> > DIO Base Object. This specification adds codepoint 7 to the registry for
> this
> > field.   For a MOP value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default
> > regardless of the setting of the "T" flag.“
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Roll mailing list
> > Roll@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>