Re: [Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42: (with COMMENT)
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4219A3A1204; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:40:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I7qWeIMWndbm; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB863A1201; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id h6so8609800vsr.6; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bH2gOSJmD+7JAwZv6ZEbH8rzAkFeNt7xFOLxO0ehCBs=; b=crRFNcAHeRLWXNZIjmbEDxEnixC3NltKDRlvhPCadZ48+uE9zJKMAQMTzvhYJSWPf/ UPdrmMgbJTVFiaDI/pxItU3XtEMrjiYLxaUQQ0UH7eZJwo7pcKanBPUtjyrFLLMaNPUP 0jMDe/K4hV2HIDZEwrY3xa6g4cf2kiiRS5Ubq+Rk2Jd3PgjL62qLZbenyoHClGtMh26v 11APJqczDWboHE1ESGbVvNET+xacjRUWkJv7qmyuBkUPM6vH3IzgKQiJYw7GAlcXeV1A +s9CkB/wGtVEKLNDQTTmxEqAKbOM67feisBa4dU0JndMS/LdpD/zdN+Zmq8kkvKt53f3 sLvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bH2gOSJmD+7JAwZv6ZEbH8rzAkFeNt7xFOLxO0ehCBs=; b=aH+ZuSmffs1vz3Ac0u4Zky5GkypZqBrAU4PtapW3pQ0+YuIYFHHkt4koLrJdSO/yov ijOAQfYTQBNXxuqVdV4mGezBWmnF9uvjK22mB80eqfLvWS52rEVeIEByXNrIJZ5agRB4 7O6Kuh4hV56hZZwRKBK/dhxtWx5GBHkq+mKAJLNYL8D43zkFAE47s4S/sIVPp2q3ZqQA bG0iND6abhw9Tiv5ugP4J4wt5E8oFQPTdG2ig4C9J2nA5RyHPs4fa+8kG7KgpDd6e7+p zbPKW+YcohQnonwQUGR9oApnffz5uKE5SKPkGkr+lRMuadYneECdtfjwTY20GtHJMvV6 arhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325C8zcAyIoQUzqQ+53mZepYRpYhD0izkxyvkXsY8hejNdJ51fl +e2BRNqthe5WzMBEzd6KpzxPw1tTZMmw7Q5nQP8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOX1KfPBLQxA2Xg75evhEcFV8tf756J+nz+uRKWxEVytpco5Ee3osZB8WuaOKOo05mqmeZwq07zPPR3S/bfuY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:7ca:: with SMTP id y10mr10924073vsg.34.1610307636379; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:40:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160814800167.20251.14392154204786699833@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160814800167.20251.14392154204786699833@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:40:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUf23n8NpWGbF__cYZBpPWJ=rjC0XORjsSpW=78rZhevsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org, roll-chairs <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, roll <roll@ietf.org>, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a543b705b890f623"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/LPh4-r_yab2OJGOZGwPeDZ2FvWE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-42: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:40:39 -0000
Dear Roman, Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions, we believe that version 43 (diff) addresses your concern, please find comments inline: Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-43 On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:46 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you to Daniel Migault for the SECDIR review. > > I have nothing substantive to add to the new text here. My feedback was > addressed in -29 after the first IESG review of this document. > > A few nits: > > ** Section 1. Editorial. s/it is recommended the reading of > [I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels] that explains/ [I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels] is > recommended reading to explain/ > <authors> fixed </authors> > > ** Section 4.2. What is “abusively naming it”? > <authors > it means that have been used plenty, we have deleted “abusively”</authors > > > ** Section 4.2. Editorial. s/There is therefore no longer a necessity > to/There > is no longer a need to/ > > <authors> fixed </authors> Thank you and best regards, Ines, Pascal and Michael
- [Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Ines Robles