[Roll] draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-07

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Tue, 20 December 2011 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=3280cf979=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCC321F8B8A; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:14:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r67z-Dkyn9r3; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip1mta.uwm.edu (ip1mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8C821F8B7D; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (HELO mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu) ([127.0.0.1]) by ip1mta.uwm.edu with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2011 10:14:21 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD0F2B3EDA; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:12:34 -0600 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzcRm0EmTauY; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:12:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta04.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CBD2B3ED8; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:12:34 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:14:21 -0600 (CST)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Jonathan Hui <jonhui@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1076398681.709387.1324397661047.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <055FAFECB2B53642884D29B0094D14751098099F@DLEE10.ent.ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [129.89.7.92]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.13_GA_2918 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.13_GA_2918)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-07
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:14:22 -0000

Jonathan

The IESG-approved draft refers to the RPL instance as the scope where the routing header can be used. How would this routing header be used for general source routing (across RPL instances) in an LLN? How would a node use this routing header if it wants to travel along a source route discovered using P2P-RPL?

Thanks
Mukul