Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

Hi Pascal,

Thanks for your comment. it makes sense.

Does this document has a shepherd assigned? Someone volunteer :-)? It 
will be nice to have new people of WGs involved in this task.

Thanks,

Peter and Ines.

On 03/22/2016 03:57 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Hello Ines,
>
> I think the draft is ripe for last call.
>
> We have spent all the cycles in the 6lo WG and the work is done, upon validation of the ROLL team. Last call is an excellent way of validating that.
>
> Could you please consider launching it? 6lo just did for the paging dispatch, and doing it now means that we can announce the result in Buenos Aires.
>
> Take care,
>
> Pascal
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ines Robles [mailto:maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com]
>> Sent: lundi 21 mars 2016 22:09
>> To: consultancy@vanderstok.org; Routing Over Low power and Lossy
>> networks <roll@ietf.org>
>> Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>; 6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org;
>> draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch@tools.ietf.org; Michael Richardson
>> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>; roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Suresh Krishnan
>> <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>; draft-ietf-6lo-paging-
>> dispatch@tools.ietf.org; Gabriel Montenegro
>> <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>; jhw@nestlabs.com; 6lo@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to
>> ROLL
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/21/2016 09:44 AM, peter van der Stok wrote:
>>> Happy to collaborate, but still dependent on Ines point of view.
>> It is ok for me, Pascal just submitted the new version. :)
>>> I would suggest that I-D is submitted as ietf-roll-.
>>> That does not need to take time; only the existing draft with a new
>>> draft identifier.
>>>
>>> I prefer to start WGLC during the meeting in B-A, having explained the
>>> situation.
>> Yes, we can start the WGLC on monday 4th.
>>> Anything I am overlooking?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> Brian Haberman schreef op 2016-03-19 00:13:
>>>> Works for me as well.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana)
>>>>> <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That works for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Alvaro.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thumb-typed and autocorrected..
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Michael Richardson
>>>>> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done
>>>>>>> and happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL
>>>>>>> perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to
>>>>>>> RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel the
>>>>>>> consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate the
>>>>>>> last call to ROLL?
>>>>>> I think that would suffice, if ADs approve.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll