Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 10 October 2020 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11483A0A49 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u0F-cNjtM5kK for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1D053A0A3D for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1450F389A0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aF_EdjpOOT_m for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9808738998 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6BE40A for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR11MB135260688C683094E8695064D8080@CY4PR11MB1352.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMESszw4SuUQtchiqk-o7Z=62X+U2af4==X5S_=rJ-3y4Dn=w@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356593481245BC85A03D4003D83F0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxgYifi+U=fTdFk5Fz+a1ArbFUzxBbeDeORhk30n2N3Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR11MB13529BF16345FBC5279A7AEBD80B0@CY4PR11MB1352.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxNR+4h+3ShfxFY7QcJaehuxd9LXuL7B+rjq5gQSGs2kA@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR11MB135260688C683094E8695064D8080@CY4PR11MB1352.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
X-Attribution: mcr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:54:14 -0400
Message-ID: <11122.1602370454@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/LiBFB0P3paopghgJ-gpz-ZhLZmw>
Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 22:54:18 -0000



Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) <pthubert=3D40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > In summary,

    > We update RFC 6775 and RFC 8505 because we alter the range of the ND Status Code
    > We extend RFC 6775 and RFC 8505 because we refrain from sending the
    > from sending the EDAR on a registration refresh with the 'R' flag.
    > We extend RFC 6775 because  we process the 'R' flag in the NA(EARO) and
    > other stuff in the RUL perspective section.

    > Do we agree?

agreed.

It's a bit of a mess, but making an omlette...
I guess there is a book here for someone.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide