[Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 26 June 2019 23:17 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE6F1201A2; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, roll-chairs@ietf.org, consultancy@vanderstok.org, roll@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <156159102176.20168.277762395154650827.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:17:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/MEWZZxnDuobClTXPDBNAPYbacMQ>
Subject: [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 23:17:05 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to the authors for a well-written and easy-to-follow document. I only have two tiny editorial suggestions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §1.2: > RPL uses NPDAO messaging in the storing mode so that the node > changing it routing adjacencies can invalidate the previous route. Nit: "...changing its routing..." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §6.2: > The following bits are currently defined: This value appears to be an enumeration rather than a bitmap, right? I think you want to replace "bits" with "values" in this sentence.
- [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ro… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Rahul Arvind Jadhav