[Roll] End of second WG LC on RPL P2P

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

The second 2-week WG LC on:
	draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05
	draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12

has now ended.

I saw comments from Joseph Reddy - Authors, could you please address them and then I'll send the publication request.

Thanks.

JP and Michael.

On May 23, 2012, at 11:44 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Second last call on
> 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
> 
> 
> will end May 25th at noon ET, just a reminder.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> On May 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> A first WG Last Call took place on March 16th on:
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-04 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-09
>> 
>> Thanks to all of you for the fruitful and constructive comments received during WG Last call, that led 
>> to several tickets that have been successfully closed, leading to new revisions of these documents.
>> 
>> This starts a new 2-week WG last call on:
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
>> 
>> The WG Last call will end on May 25th at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list and copy the authors.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> JP and Michael.  
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
>>> Date: April 13, 2012 11:21:00 PM GMT+02:00
>>> To: JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: "[e-mail] WG" <[e-mail]>
>>> 
>>> Dear JP,
>>> 
>>> Sounds quite reasonable.
>>> 
>>> Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Thomas
>>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>> 
>>>> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
>>>> 
>>>> Plan is:
>>>> * Close on the last open ticket
>>>> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
>>>> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, have a good week-end.
>>>> 
>>>> JP.
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> JP.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Thomas Heide Clausen
>>>>>> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
>>>>>> discuss it."
>>>>>>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll