[Roll] End of second WG LC on RPL P2P

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Fri, 25 May 2012 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E504021F8745 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.359, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJkZ+k0-an91 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgl-iport-1.cisco.com (bgl-iport-1.cisco.com [72.163.197.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F3221F8746 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=12696; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1337962094; x=1339171694; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=+TjmMoY3MAot76JqxKprViRz+lSgOxrOZkfXw+T/ueY=; b=NkYsC0PbvfgxHPD1CKqNH8hIffa75AVmEpoWD17QSs3EzkG4Xi9J7zWW NX1Q96YA/A7TPzOOCyrklBo2JYZbZtok6OnQML/HOkG3M1N130qiw1y4s SgZ7Om54PLv38i7lMvp5yyJd1NEvT4h8TNVX6n4/l+TiBib/WT/RHvwKp 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYFANatv09Io8UY/2dsb2JhbABEDoMPr1uDIYIVAQEBAwEBAQEPAVsLBQscAwECAS4nKAgGARIJGYdmBQubRJ9TiwEkhEJgA5UYhU+IPYFkgic7
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,657,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="13029244"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-2.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2012 16:08:12 +0000
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com [64.104.123.69]) by bgl-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4PG8Can031461; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:08:12 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.70]) by xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 26 May 2012 00:08:12 +0800
Received: from [10.60.114.229] ([10.60.114.229]) by xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 26 May 2012 00:08:09 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3CD2A0E9-3573-427A-AF64-3D7EE0B88980"
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <258174AC-25D5-447B-B9A1-11DE371CACD3@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 18:08:07 +0200
Message-Id: <56A5FC1D-5D5E-456C-A314-4C43BFF89BE2@cisco.com>
References: <9850315F-B3E6-4A29-AAD5-B53E6C978F69@thomasclausen.org> <66E2061B-4866-4276-B69A-6FD150D6EB93@cisco.com> <258174AC-25D5-447B-B9A1-11DE371CACD3@cisco.com>
To: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>, Mukul Goyal <mukul@UWM.EDU>, Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.baccelli@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2012 16:08:09.0546 (UTC) FILETIME=[93F28AA0:01CD3A90]
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Subject: [Roll] End of second WG LC on RPL P2P
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:08:17 -0000

Dear all,

The second 2-week WG LC on:
	draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05
	draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12

has now ended.

I saw comments from Joseph Reddy - Authors, could you please address them and then I'll send the publication request.

Thanks.

JP and Michael.

On May 23, 2012, at 11:44 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Second last call on
> 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
> 
> 
> will end May 25th at noon ET, just a reminder.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> On May 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> A first WG Last Call took place on March 16th on:
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-04 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-09
>> 
>> Thanks to all of you for the fruitful and constructive comments received during WG Last call, that led 
>> to several tickets that have been successfully closed, leading to new revisions of these documents.
>> 
>> This starts a new 2-week WG last call on:
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
>> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
>> 
>> The WG Last call will end on May 25th at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list and copy the authors.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> JP and Michael.  
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>;
>>> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
>>> Date: April 13, 2012 11:21:00 PM GMT+02:00
>>> To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>;
>>> Cc: "roll@ietf.org WG" <roll@ietf.org>;
>>> 
>>> Dear JP,
>>> 
>>> Sounds quite reasonable.
>>> 
>>> Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Thomas
>>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>> 
>>>> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
>>>> 
>>>> Plan is:
>>>> * Close on the last open ticket
>>>> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
>>>> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, have a good week-end.
>>>> 
>>>> JP.
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> JP.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Thomas Heide Clausen
>>>>>> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
>>>>>> discuss it."
>>>>>>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll