Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2E1200E0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:30:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPYmkZj1114D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A01E120041 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id r22so1025034uam.11 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:30:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qtqpbfaIMEmCQuemQ9L5sqANnsiXMKw9CY29e/a5bsA=; b=N9TRV/Mk1mKazy/FgAFtu8bijfuvDjP4PeFRCSV26ZgK2qpoJMHuhJg5jmnd3Lduw9 WB9iA5eESN0eNBT2xZ1qw29xdsymIpZyyAZ05J3Ge9YhJu+OCJaVdecZMEC4WgoePO7M Pnmre+Rj7XcAld0IBdihNvJaNPFCMEoeY3OAABWW5qffdF95Ij8AKV5Hijb+qQFQMWPg jNwcJwagSYRodeqOU009raEqUzkHeGSrDrKVseExfETuFWLAPLBhmt4w9qJjDywM1USb NU4qRKfoN7+bc49pzzC0qDaq84dGYi6SeMRGjLOddB9Ul7ttyO1FxKvCYRlAvZUACsHr WLxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qtqpbfaIMEmCQuemQ9L5sqANnsiXMKw9CY29e/a5bsA=; b=DdkRRZ5VYDU0AW5veIusRGml7coeL/Xc/9zYmDRk6P9XXSCVJC5BXPA+gkOxV/gUc+ gs5O4yS5gA+N33c7moNZkL2E3traWtzaj0RFsGt36tnUiUkvR7FnfSjs1JXYNcjYZ+Ny uAUXOsBz09rgu8ZXexjByB+cKAWufVZ1dBF7sTst1iRGiy0Y2xSsbL8hRibghhMDS4kF ZzeVtzSdIh5iGa0wXNn0f6nl3UIHYoXcQ5ImAf1VQes++iwI6vlsSnNa8+y0AR4y9Taj aIJeI0HclJdwzrfmE/wBqUW5AwSUbV+PlsVTO4NXcsXYz2dGcM7Um3wZq1eQVeiZk69r i0cQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWd3h2wPuwWwWTJleqGGef6QqcWrPg+uyD7FpcwQpkqbHB5HDoq yChdK/XD7miYsPrzX8J7+lf2bm03ms2xqxkxuPIZbQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTimPy/NOQ55NGW78lGTLqWT8rdXqgffazAywdrFp50J5b1ZZVH1eHh4o9A2+FsZgE03aMhDDrnH9kirTNdjg=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7509:: with SMTP id m9mr5681075uap.136.1574346640050; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:30:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO0Djp20PRZnzTO4pU0KPmiCPcdEiitJYLdoLWOmOkgj6-vzmA@mail.gmail.com> <14503_1574325685_5DD64DB5_14503_98_1_D9FC6DEA.6C3D8%dominique.barthel@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <14503_1574325685_5DD64DB5_14503_98_1_D9FC6DEA.6C3D8%dominique.barthel@orange.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:30:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp3cr14POoZttceo+bvjarzAcgTaDvfjkCH8VbZk+HaWFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003bd11f0597dc24bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/MgLLh2rzJ33z5U0DecgDtoC38is>
Subject: Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:30:43 -0000

Hi Dominique,


> However, we should agree quickly what to do about 3.2, which currently
> contradicts 3.1 and also ties MOPex and CAPabilities back together.
>

[RJ] Which is the contradictory stmt in 3.1 you are referring to?

Thanks,
Rahul