Re: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (6987)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 15 June 2022 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFCEC157B5E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_O2Kj2jwNM5 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F42BC14F742 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBBE425A380; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miOr8GnrIfO4; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE582425A37C; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220609111901.248EE4C1CE@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:27:57 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DD325E43-D881-45B8-BF38-33B5191D040C@amsl.com>
References: <20220609111901.248EE4C1CE@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: robbe.elsas@ugent.be, wintert@acm.org, pthubert@cisco.com, abr@sdesigns.dk, jhui@archrock.com, kelsey@ember.com, pal@cs.stanford.edu, kpister@dustnetworks.com, rstruik.ext@gmail.com, jpv@cisco.com, roger.alexander@cooperindustries.com, roll@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/NFG8FKXs-sIOhdvZHD8IEYLWV8s>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:36:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (6987)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:28:02 -0000

Greetings,

We note that this erratum reports the same issue as was reported in errata report 4618 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4618).

As such, we have deleted this report.

Please let us know any concerns.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Jun 9, 2022, at 4:19 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6550,
> "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6987
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Robbe Elsas <robbe.elsas@ugent.be>
> 
> Section: 6.7.6
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Reserved: 7-bit unused field.  The field MUST be initialized to zero
>      by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Reserved: 8-bit unused field.  The field MUST be initialized to zero
>      by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Figure 24 clearly shows that the Reserved field of DODAG Configuration options is 8 bits long.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6550 (draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
> Publication Date    : March 2012
> Author(s)           : T. Winter, Ed., P. Thubert, Ed., A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, JP. Vasseur, R. Alexander
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>