IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 12 May 2017 06:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30789129572 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 23:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ic8qmSn8Acv7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 23:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D1E12957B for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 23:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e64so25146477pfd.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 23:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=70RZ6/cUhnd9PD/2cWqH15pnrq+6+5zxK4gbnnx0PZk=; b=N1x8W17c0jRJMl5nPmU1tuNV/y5NLpeolmzLfrpgc8zNPtjb/6THt1xAlxz/TnGAVm 05IrrrYFF9cc4YbvLxOjegc9KIB1buPladZN8tnbrWaE0wZrBqdvgnOcloUqWr7raD63 jtRudo2bhhv1ZPFwkBQj0EgQ92ahAdVZE20WZjYx6LmQskCc+RsxKNSKfEKQiyUBeRVb 22mYc+1HSOz1aDdIw7XmwOfyLYVCt1DPE2O09J7HMKfgy5OeY+Mjl0APaij7y0keY3HL +xvXGPpjimmDeeZCs/AEaxpulPUpVBmBhn8MwIyPGqElZpTq7hiYiP6+bx6XiMjvZWlw t/sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=70RZ6/cUhnd9PD/2cWqH15pnrq+6+5zxK4gbnnx0PZk=; b=qLn7x2Vyv4osL5efzMC9rDemDDl/UTNyv//v2EAWkjpQ2wQQgmROQ7iEVr35BDedlH C/rAkxhOjO65W7ELsJENh5EVJMalhPIPCd43dw5bhfZeMKz3wXlCd4un4Q0JL0PwDm3B XathTMnXZneJpPuw5ku3PyHxtbjQGPZ1aNdnqBZjKVWsyTxlVKCg+DK//fONVNNA5srV 0UqR21U8hp6DeGLulwWYBZnyPQVJnKMtsUksk42P77PJVjwWrksE8/eTbC+AsLdBLbKH IyNvH6qo5cD676sPRu0Zo8lDXLLdQ3bko/LCrvnbt9b6IiyzQyXoT532GiVBkXt79Ua8 hykQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB4Pb1hWZpunVyHRNppkz3+ncBgqWFXwLxEX83nF+z3PZQvsbfK TfT91XKMPb2R/D7Zelw=
X-Received: by 10.99.109.130 with SMTP id i124mr2679354pgc.117.1494569888229; Thu, 11 May 2017 23:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [100.126.31.11] ([27.59.77.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u194sm2037599pgc.2.2017.05.11.23.18.06 for <roll@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 May 2017 23:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-BE872A77-AE8D-444F-A53C-896D71F54F3F"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:48:04 +0530
Message-Id: <486101F3-020B-4D40-B4F9-1B6A698C0018@gmail.com>
References: <6352.1494433492@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <D5388F92.3AF0C%d.sturek@att.net> <21405.1494505912@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <21405.1494505912@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14E304)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/OCG0dHfKFJyAsFh6a40uAJUGRQU>
Subject: Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 06:22:42 -0000

As someone who had previously reviewed the draft, I can say it is not an easy going with reviewing the draft. But i didn't had any suggestions on improving the readability then.

The proposal to modify it to put 12 cases with storing, non storing section in each case sounds good to me... It will also reduce some repeatative text put in context to explaining the scenario of the case. Also the tabular view for header changes is also repeatative in some case (raf to root flow for e.g.). Not sure if the table view for header manipulation for storing, non storing be merged easily for all cases with good readability.

Regards,
Rahul

> On 11-May-2017, at 6:01 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
>> I think implementers will use either one of storing or non-storing.  At
> 
> Yes, that's true.
> I'm more concerned for reviewers in some ways.
> 
>> least for me, having a dedicated section describing the specific method
>> of operation is useful (versus having to read through and skip over the
>> MOP not in use).
> 
>> Plus it saves you having to edit the current draft!
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email