IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Consensus Call on abandoning draft-ietf-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A201A02DF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:04:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajBCR7bveEx0 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x232.google.com (mail-ve0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77EC1A0126 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id jw12so1996825veb.37 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:04:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UI9gBnh9kt24cYWclwjJPcSz7eDYffONCLyIuSqTj9I=; b=WOyGBLAOKFARLVfAOyKX64RozsiaTUdxDowng1ydNJOkjK4kFuOM0DrTMlsVbG4LJW qOgVy3ZW6EUndczvKeWnwy+SwJYdn5hUcjkvP3DrCXvKRjJAOBBPFgEDmvV9iEuXCRAg h9H8SqTee/Dh4lT8hufqQ8wWmcSuwMkiHkbFYEprbZq2zYuoshM20y0cBFqwLrH9OxNe lXK1QV6glZ41xQxnyInAIiP+SpGjSB+iZID41q5M1KvKQZiV0iLybSfkPNn5IqLB9Xmn v2FmpVuuAhT8DgHqLdR3mzzCKn/TNYaTQZ0FksqpT+lqGdm+Jxd7JCZrRFKIgtfge1wA JUuA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.123.70 with SMTP id ly6mr651468veb.26.1393902267093; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:04:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.221.16.3 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:04:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20307.1393842148@sandelman.ca>
References: <CAP+sJUdJHuugP9-4kkAce5Cyg3UwnGJnvB9Ggs0tf_yKOH5qRg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89gP+sk1A9QZufsiKFz5d0k99K5+qjM+hUcUfE7iYFeRQ@mail.gmail.com> <20307.1393842148@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:04:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUcBP6mhGC5nX927kKqMrmosWcKdCzddODrjb5nbhRS8sQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0118490e7b574a04f3bf2983"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/OOENT5AIQkeONAWITcJMWFIUTG0
Subject: Re: [Roll] Consensus Call on abandoning draft-ietf-roll-rpl-industrial-applicability
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:04:34 -0000

*Hi, Threads about it:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08087.html
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08087.html>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08458.html
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08458.html> Thanks
and Regards,*


2014-03-03 7:22 GMT-03:00 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>:

>
> Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > I don't agree to make quick decisions or consensus. Why is this draft
>     > not useful to industry? if we know what was the industry respond,
> then
>     > we will be able to decide. we should not confuse purposes of this WG
>     > with another WG, may be the some industry companies we speak to are
>     > still confused with new technologies. Please help,
>
> 1) The purpose of this call is to get that feedback. If you have some
>    information that the WG does not yet know,  or can share this request
> with
>    someone from that industry who can respond, please do so.
>
> 2) We asked the question several weeks ago, but it was not in the form of a
>    consensus call.
>    This discussion first started in August 2013.  This has not been a quick
>    decision.
>
> 3) Should an interested party show up that wants has a way to use RPL in
>    industrial settings *without* 6tisch (or not using 15.4e), then we can
>    re-introduce a document, and it would be authored by someone who is
>    actually involved.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email