Re: [Roll] IPIP encapsulation and MPL
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 15 August 2016 15:21 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804FA12D6B9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8yo6QoNHu_V for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A5312D190 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.215]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id XTLv1t0014eRkWy01TLvfH; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:20:56 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:e4ec:b1fe:135b:cf39 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:20:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:20:54 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <2444.1471273472@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <2444.1471273472@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <11c195479f102b1a7a0bd75bae808cbc@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (cWvJFyWX6YvjiAd64kz8W7anrYtj0w4W)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/OP588wZQ9Cq5SDkMjvnstIwCCd0>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: [Roll] IPIP encapsulation and MPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:21:01 -0000
Hi Michael, staying within the MC scope no encapsulation is needed. Going out, or coming form outside; yes there is. There is a paragraph on this aspect in RFC 7732 Greetings, Peter Michael Richardson schreef op 2016-08-15 17:04: > During the Admin-Scope discussion about MPL and the like, I recall we > had > some discussion about needing IPIP encapsulation. I don't think that > this > is in the MPL RFC. I have been looking for slides that explained it; > maybe > we realized that we didn't ever need it. > > But, my memory is dim. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > Roll@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
- Re: [Roll] IPIP encapsulation and MPL Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] IPIP encapsulation and MPL peter van der Stok
- [Roll] IPIP encapsulation and MPL Michael Richardson