Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B473A0770;
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id l5bq-eqyah3Y; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 047F03A064A;
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id b17so10102367ilh.4;
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=Iud5vjA9hR6ArCweTsDsPf1bOI6KMRqlfyLQ8yg0FPA=;
b=lC4CZKxcVFDmbDLK4z3moXb0TYB6NUXbvTx/+O3lR05BrYCnWONgFCfKc1LLgYr8Xw
5v2hQxIVXcwxvKlqyf5y7Za9l9BB2Nfu1/0nlB5ZQrPNudJ3qnHadCD98nYjKeYaN9pF
RwouCJom5tH9L8phb/gi0WMmuPhwIwBHsouMwdZbWjbFgEuTAEYy4bdVGlVelH43DyOj
CtqHGKwrVw7dlXsjHbZezqsF8YhwG7Nz7NaiXj74y855Ag3NsIV2Zx4yQnbkoUn8FmRF
8rw1VoD6khYqpB+tHsuSn3qaW6Ys7zhru6pDuznvYcCQuMkJtkv25PPtltyQDSQ2I4ys
EA1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=Iud5vjA9hR6ArCweTsDsPf1bOI6KMRqlfyLQ8yg0FPA=;
b=jdb1EEsu+rWWM/jmiyaiBtswSxrtF+bfWxsYERdGrGh8AYWrYN2UvRtCBWu0KbPeC1
Mb+mXeVLyFdtuDuBZie+wQmEfYh0ZE1EfakVK/doD6JKV5ci3NXGsKC/lduimH7XBLKb
hqjZuRUqOcuoCCi/GLkqrwi17AI6o/lheKkOLe0yU/FlTbaGB/Mdsjd5p1+exfFRNfs1
DwurC+UZLUXp+2UDoaAgXTTIIbuCLSn0UfiC9Zq0qGnvWsp6oVo/z7Zh5knzrAoPXGO+
LDyYF4hd1HIFqeKZP5iZ8ZByOX8+qSRfLz7U4ZJwEhm+d1GuwUOgTXenZZN55iKwEyw5
bETg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324JOJyudKuSt2ejsrsR1494xNjdUCGfvDmjHDdnAIOj4x65CLL
A/WXn6f4vkoh4v/lk5fen8OVu1vq+SVhdXAz8C8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi0R8WQ99vZTQkd1FngmNcPZKaVvrriCFgZ5+f7ZXrvyYlz2vqiPta9hBsXKf06I3VguA/xlhf3eHV6eKgjlU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6906:: with SMTP id e6mr3085862ilc.249.1599853999244;
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159968972884.1065.3876077471852624744@ietfa.amsl.com>
<MN2PR11MB35659A0710E687A7C9995E6ED8270@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20200910200744.GE89563@kduck.mit.edu> <17053.1599841430@localhost>
<20200911162617.GQ89563@kduck.mit.edu> <4724.1599853045@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4724.1599853045@localhost>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:53:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxSp9n-MKWamQDN+3MHcN8TNJUinJB_Kjc55OY+=6engaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>,
Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>,
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>,
"roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>,
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@yahoo.com>,
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>,
"draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000514c7b05af0f09e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/OPneD-eF-myHvQblKJIHoJkPmwk>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on
draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>,
<mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>,
<mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:53:21 -0000
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:37 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote: > >> Tthat's exactly what we don't want to do. > >> > >> We are saying NOTHING about rfc8138 when MOP==7. > >> Nor are we saying that the T-bit exists (or doesn't exist). > > > That's not how I read: > > > For a MOP value of 7, the compression MUST be used by default > > regardless of the setting of the "T" flag. > > While I think that's probably what we'll conclude, this wasn't in for WGLC > that I recall. I think that this also must have gotten in during IESG > review. > > Pascal, can we make this say: > For a MOP value of 7, there is no "T" flag, and the compression > behaviour will be defined by future work. > > I believe this text would be sufficient to lift my DISCUSS, though I don't completely understand the interaction between MOP and versioning in this protocol.
- [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-rol… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live discuss… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live dis… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live dis… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live dis… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Agenda for Monday (Re: MOP==7 live dis… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Martin Duke