IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 12 May 2017 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B3D129404 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1EPkajUKuRo7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5081294F4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c15so9241546ith.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cqx1RHQNbARwnwCCkkyQynYUkCkJZyag61uWSBoNKz8=; b=Q2siwZs3BDtEXzY+rE9OGbKeRorNWsuhCBMaPPzQifxrC6E3XMuKtnyEW5ACpg5Qj8 fZ8b0JcI0wHb+ufWimK2Svllse6rVAqv06XMSlP2Y/AjNTcAsW5UV0HN5G6Xi6BxvKY3 iYV7tzrdeoyA5sX19zi/1JWuhocfvuphsmsKBElLxc288LKN2P8Heoz73nVc6sLW/JcB 8CayLghXOqbtqpiVxOFG/QzhrvGVumagUpg2L+jt9459FNzoNo4iVfYQLiHqtO9aLa/l IVBMDzEEudv5R5c+e6EvScfcaLdrl66YQBZqnkuL5PUHYcmG8RRl1nN80h7gojchz+Db aukA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=cqx1RHQNbARwnwCCkkyQynYUkCkJZyag61uWSBoNKz8=; b=pyu9TUzpQMkrbM20Ew1GtL4vkVZBRwZD4YaK0BUd9O/5IpJA9S5nRtqqE52FgMrXBk I8qpCxTj5k3ADO1rGTecgfgvdFV7079AI77jOWLhmTrl1vKAkMai6npVgnAZ7VDAkenj bfOjtdTtQUlLHVL49vzboqPl4alKBhj86TMOmzedR242dxu6hyM6MiOKlD4gvi5NezX4 rg3KSfPFTB978bBkvKUIzSrIZo5p1vHE91r9b6hy3DyRLfaWMRBmS3sVoRT1lNscBsgZ i8tywpt92b7d61X17JdnrBLLMRxCz+muj3i85AX+QXmXz+i7UUPXSolRXXaq9u3Vtl60 DOxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCuKUCodqsS1gDn4eHYcQPHEToDO+EQkXoJ8YMqkp2oG0H86Qu9 awbuFmDuW3iooGFmJzijcLy2girY0g==
X-Received: by 10.36.120.23 with SMTP id p23mr3309833itc.106.1494590915629; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.97.132 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <486101F3-020B-4D40-B4F9-1B6A698C0018@gmail.com>
References: <6352.1494433492@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <D5388F92.3AF0C%d.sturek@att.net> <21405.1494505912@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <486101F3-020B-4D40-B4F9-1B6A698C0018@gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:08:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUd6vuGO093udFP4FtwLHwTx07n0QS7eA+agRwL1sJxt5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11485dd89c5ff6054f5290d9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/P-fujWV7LHohgkR_kVIzU8d021A>
Subject: Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 12:13:26 -0000

Thank you very much for all your comments,

We are working  to improve the readability.

Cheers,

Ines.

2017-05-12 3:18 GMT-03:00 Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>:

>
> As someone who had previously reviewed the draft, I can say it is not an
> easy going with reviewing the draft. But i didn't had any suggestions on
> improving the readability then.
>
> The proposal to modify it to put 12 cases with storing, non storing
> section in each case sounds good to me... It will also reduce some
> repeatative text put in context to explaining the scenario of the case.
> Also the tabular view for header changes is also repeatative in some case
> (raf to root flow for e.g.). Not sure if the table view for header
> manipulation for storing, non storing be merged easily for all cases with
> good readability.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul
>
> On 11-May-2017, at 6:01 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
>
> Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
>
> I think implementers will use either one of storing or non-storing.  At
>
>
> Yes, that's true.
> I'm more concerned for reviewers in some ways.
>
> least for me, having a dedicated section describing the specific method
>
> of operation is useful (versus having to read through and skip over the
>
> MOP not in use).
>
>
> Plus it saves you having to edit the current draft!
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email