Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority-04

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 11 August 2021 00:25 UTC

From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <91C647AE-2197-4FC7-95DD-B2A2EC29306B@cisco.com>
References: <f7a504ac-764d-09e9-d969-067e6a21646a@mimuw.edu.pl> <26245.1628534920@localhost>, <bd68ec3f-489d-a041-8a6f-1b39aca35202@mimuw.edu.pl> <9A1DA017-AF66-4349-B070-57A4BC28A48A@cisco.com>, <12297.1628617331@localhost> <91C647AE-2197-4FC7-95DD-B2A2EC29306B@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:25:42 -0400
Message-ID: <27800.1628641542@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/PDN_GaTApBxuT3UGGYqDRtFlzJw>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority-04
Precedence: list

Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > With 2) different parents may give different values for the same
    > sequence. Which should our node pick? The one from the preferred
    > parent? Or should the node reparent to the best offer? There’s
    > complexity and consequences to that decision of picking one value. And
    > then no way to know the abstract desirability of the next dodag since
    > the value from the root is lost.

A node should only care about the value from the preferred parent.
These values should never affect parent selection, but just be about other
nodes either enrolling, or joining this PANID.

So I don't understand what you write.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

Attachment: signature.asc

[Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-prior… Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Rahul Jadhav
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Michael Richardson
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Michael Richardson
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Michael Richardson
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Michael Richardson
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Michael Richardson
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
[Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-prior… Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-p… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
[Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-12 Konrad Iwanicki
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-12 Charles Perkins
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-12 Konrad Iwanicki

Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority-04

Attachment: signature.asc