Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26: (with COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

In the IANA Considerations  section:

IANA is requested to add [this document] as a reference for MOP 7 in the
RPL Mode of Operation registry.


All documents that define a MOP 7 behavior should have that sentence.  Only
UseofRPLInfo will have the extra text about reserving 7.



From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: December 18, 2020 at 3:54:10 AM
To: Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Michael
Richardson <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>
<[e-mail]>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy
networks <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
<[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Benjamin Kaduk
<[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, The IESG <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Subject:  RE: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on
draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26: (with COMMENT)
Thanks!

Alvaro.

> Dear all:
>
>
>
> Sorry I failed to compute that the registry that Benjamin referred to was
> the IANA one.
>
> I see that it can be useful there and will be happy to do whatever change
> that helps in the future.
>
> Let us agree on a sentence/section to add in the drafts. Suggestions
> appreciated : )
>
>
>
> You all keep safe, and let us enjoy the break, and for the lucky of us in
> these troubled times, with our families;
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* jeudi 17 décembre 2020 22:40
> *To:* Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; Routing Over Low power and
> Lossy networks <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Benjamin Kaduk <
> [e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Roll] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> Let’s do it in each document where a behavior is specified for MOP 7.
> That way it remains consistent in case there’s something else in the future.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Alvaro.
>
>
>
> On December 17, 2020 at 4:18:33 PM, Michael Richardson (
> [e-mail]) wrote:
>
>
> Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > To do it can be as simple as requesting IANA to add additional
> references
> > to MOP 7 in the registry.
>
> So, it goes into the IANA Considerations for all three documents?
> Or, into useofrplinfo only, where we reserved it?
> Or, is it just an IESG request to IANA?
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>