Return-Path: X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12900120103 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:08:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hh0QDojJHCMY for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD7F12008C for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id r144so4205323iod.8 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5HWpsnPVAGyq+r12kQ5AJ/a4WkWmAEGHgiceshwvEU4=; b=PIlOe5Q5M3XhFbouYKQJCatIOLtIIQ3d8YSWbKA6pIH3lCs4mdULxfAnI3qvv7Vc05 SiNVLD7y9aCT+otSjN5z/JaVur3zIyYeNzoDWkSF8D5JsuFXsKLz4DTnode5c5XCGGS+ OjmP2cSb7PwDZ+AhE7sTN3MoBdVDPkUnAIaHhCZIQXKwjSZYWrZDgpbfLdB5ZQ9y9D2g nD5KoSAi2GS0X1ttP/EBA3FeAZ6KfP7WSfknoJ3rINKTJQBqfQLHCQ1OAE8aTqwpPneP Z4cuK+obSZX1QCgCwxFfgrDiimDoPWGx+bRZtR/0kz6VI5/myRKUYcYlmalfLIlwipup vHVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=5HWpsnPVAGyq+r12kQ5AJ/a4WkWmAEGHgiceshwvEU4=; b=MNALDxhOnwg5W5ERC51TcI3kPpRoxOy79WbMVYEIel3yj8KSGZcQ9/4bdDYfW7MWYk h/ELRAGryIfrk6mkq25BYXmVkAtgyXfC20oqeED471ZPyPVyZ3giaFbyV+nRJVsKFhaq 7TLKIiKoFKt/FbEpQR9BQSl08XH2CVQwYuiVP0jTNW0JX1vuumokHzRZHjMtzudUvoey MQmD+19Fdxfp9wBaaeY3VleAkyKrnrMPe+5OEZijqpg+c9VwFMYe2Al4edV7BQqFYncq Hwq+QeXrcxzSd8GtFTDLLrNN1kp8kqwcZUyi1C8MEyseerUoz74EL/Wt3vrw0UzCgsuy SbjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUOBBN0eHUgjA/EmrWSvx3XI1GpSPc2mS+RRjCpGsoL8tP2fsYo li40Dwb0mxE6s53PrqlztKqdK/dSIppFZ1uydS8l2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwH22m42mnuxx32civdlxCdk44/GqXS7zdH7hfqr5tnyZWVQJ5EymyXdh3VB1THazkqeJgWce7RqzORwMg7nE8= X-Received: by 2002:a02:3943:: with SMTP id w3mr199430jae.57.1572469702233; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:08:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4422_1572425152_5DB94DC0_4422_62_1_D9DF0C50.6B281%dominique.barthel@orange.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ines Robles Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 23:07:45 +0200 Message-ID: To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005941e0596272294" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Roll] =?utf-8?q?WGLC_for_=E2=80=8Bdraft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension?= =?utf-8?q?-04?= X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:08:26 -0000 --00000000000005941e0596272294 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Aris, You are right :), no document should leave a WG before addressing all existing comments. :) Have a great evening, Ines. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:54 PM Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis wrote: > Great, > > thanks for the explanation, it's clear to me now. > My impression was that WGLC would mean immediately leaving outside the WG > to be evaluated, and I wasn't sure if we are ready for that before > answering all existing comments. > > Again, thanks, > Aris > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ines Robles 40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> Hi Remous, >> >> Thank you for addressing the Rahul comments. >> >> If not, does going ahead with the WGLC mean you have no (significant) >>> issues with it? >>> >> >> This document got reviews in past versions, which were addressed (I >> missed the last Rahul comments, Thanks Rahul for pointing it out!!). >> Thus, we believe that is ready for a last round of WG reviews through a >> Last Call. When someone support a document, it should read/review it >> before states the support. >> Once that the Rahul comments are addressed, I believe that it can go >> forward. Unless someone states the opposite and outline more issues. >> >> Hope the above can answer this question. >> >> Thank you and best regards, >> >> Ines. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >>> >>> Best, >>> Aris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:56 AM Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis < >>> aris@ariskou.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> yes, I was planning to addess them, I should have an update by tomorrow >>>> as well as responses to Rahul's comments. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Aris >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:53 AM Rahul Jadhav >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I had sent my comments sometime before. >>>>> Link: >>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Y-zFm6XQPwwMYRqTQYbyBwe9Qm4 >>>>> >>>>> I certainly feel the draft needs updates. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Rahul >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From:* Roll on behalf of >>>>> dominique.barthel@orange.com >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 30, 2019 8:45 AM >>>>> *To:* roll@ietf.org >>>>> *Subject:* [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension-04 >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) starts today (10/30) until 11/13 for >>>>> *draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension-04*. >>>>> The draft is available here: >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension/ >>>>> Please review this draft to see if you think that it is ready for >>>>> publication and send comments to the list stating your view. >>>>> Thank you very much in advance, >>>>> >>>>> Ines, Peter and Dominique. >>>>> >>>>> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >>>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >>>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >>>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >>>>> >>>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >>>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Roll mailing list >>>>> Roll@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Roll mailing list >>>> Roll@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Roll mailing list >>> Roll@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Roll mailing list >> Roll@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >> > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > Roll@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll > --00000000000005941e0596272294 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Aris,

You are right :), no document = should leave a WG before addressing all existing comments. :)
Have a great evening,

Ines.
=


On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:54 PM Remous-Aris Kouts= iamanis <aris@ariskou.com> wr= ote:
Great,

thanks for the explanation, it&#= 39;s clear to me now.
My impression was that WGLC would mean imme= diately leaving outside the WG to be evaluated, and I wasn't sure if we= are ready for that before answering all existing comments.

<= /div>
Again, thanks,
Aris

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:= 45 PM Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=3D40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> w= rote:
Hi Remous,=C2=A0

Thank you for= addressing the Rahul comments.=C2=A0

If not, does going ahead with the WGLC mean you have no (sign= ificant) issues with it?

This d= ocument got reviews in past versions, which were addressed (I missed the la= st Rahul comments, Thanks Rahul for pointing it out!!).=C2=A0=C2=A0
Thus, we believe that is ready for a last round of WG reviews through a = Last Call.=C2=A0 When someone support a document, it should read/review it = before states the support.=C2=A0
Once that the Rahul comments are= addressed, I believe that it can go forward. Unless someone states the opp= osite and outline more issues.=C2=A0

Hope the abov= e can answer this question.=C2=A0

Thank you and be= st regards,

Ines.
=C2=A0

Thanks a lot.

Best,
Aris






On W= ed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:56 AM Remous-Aris Koutsiamanis <aris@ariskou.com> wrote:
= Hello,

yes, I was planning to addess them, I shoul= d have an update by tomorrow as well as responses to Rahul's comments.<= /div>

Best,
Aris

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019= at 10:53 AM Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> wrote:
I had sent my comments sometime before.

I certainly feel the draft needs updates.

Regards,
Rahul=C2=A0
From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf = of domini= que.barthel@orange.com <dominique.barthel@orange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 8:45 AM
To: roll@ietf.org= <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: [Roll] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension-04
=C2=A0
Dear all,

A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) starts today (10/30) until 11/13 for = draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension-04.
The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-nsa-extension/=C2=A0
Please review this draft to see if you think that it is ready for publ= ication and send comments to the list stating your view.
Thank you very much in advance,

Ines, Peter and Dominique.

______________________________________________________________________=
___________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden=
tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu=
 ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les message=
s electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou =
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf=
ormation that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele=
te this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been =
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
--00000000000005941e0596272294--