Re: [Roll] Compressing the PDAO natively

Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com> Sat, 27 July 2019 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67AD1201D1 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocCIwb1kmNOa for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AE7120181 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3C46CC29D85DAB074E5D for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 01:25:46 +0100 (IST)
Received: from BLREML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.172) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 01:25:46 +0100
Received: from BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.12.147]) by blreml703-cah.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 05:55:38 +0530
From: Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] Compressing the PDAO natively
Thread-Index: AdVDr4JzZac2e1l+THeV6NrQSFMX+QAFzSKAABKxEQA=
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 00:25:37 +0000
Message-ID: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DF6514B@BLREML503-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB3565E133DA12559F333A78B8D8C00@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <22182.1564174683@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <22182.1564174683@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.109.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Q15mlFoWrJn85USXIMLxgzfpQT4>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Compressing the PDAO natively
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 00:25:50 -0000

Hi Michael, Do you have the implementation anywhere? I would like to experiment as well. Thanks

    > What do you all think?

Years ago, I applied GHC to RPL control packets, and I got rather good results.