Re: [Roll] RPLinfo review

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA8B12D6A8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 07:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WSfeptEcBOv for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 07:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C8512D10F for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 07:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1096; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464963857; x=1466173457; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rcVg6oRVmez2cfWNx48zbsf5KbZnzUWnvSwib3ptEE8=; b=Fo8JtNe4161BfjpyIB8SuBV0U0hP2QeY632VC6bLGR71T8v449d2FqA5 QyiZHC0WsZBD9f7UBzGjJQTAclGy8F7pOPXcAApi8JzuvrEK78L5Ndogd Z2BPKpUiOkC2cj7eH+N26pvMrOlrcjpTKmNVIpxwpRrisAhg2i2A2W4o8 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AIAgCeklFX/4cNJK1cgzqBUwa6UoF5g?= =?us-ascii?q?l+DMwKBNDgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEUBAQEEOksEAgEIEQQBAQEeCQcyFAkIAgQTCIg?= =?us-ascii?q?NAxe+TA2EHwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYYnhE2CQ4FjhXQFmEUBjhyPI?= =?us-ascii?q?49RAR42g25uiRN/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,412,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="281169398"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jun 2016 14:24:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u53EOGis022096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:24:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:24:15 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:24:15 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPLinfo review
Thread-Index: AQHRuueHocL1qoRZGkGUYFK71S2Q1J/X0OHA
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:24:11 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:23:48 +0000
Message-ID: <aa0bb90070c240999c5415b2f6a95231@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <09c3e3fc17b5de9b7366d226c034da28@xs4all.nl> <CAP+sJUePiV+_Nd+f-H-x_zNoTgkS0Cqe1rq7qD7ie_H3MyOorw@mail.gmail.com> <bc96b8913fff031fc1f41eedfdb6bee3@xs4all.nl> <CAP+sJUe=t7MwkVAUd33+tz_M7J6sqmHKahCQsiBm_e86eHb6cA@mail.gmail.com> <9331.1464663161@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <9331.1464663161@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.49.80.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/QKn217WQIGSL1p3wi7dJyETOWnA>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPLinfo review
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:24:19 -0000

Yes, normally instances are logical beasts that operate as ship in the night. Think Vlans.

Cheers,

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: mardi 31 mai 2016 04:53
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>;
> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPLinfo review
> 
> 
> Ines  Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>; wrote:
>     > Thanks for the clarification.
> 
>     > We are just considering here one RPLInstance.
> 
>     > Working with different RPLInstances, involves deeply analysis, which we
>     > could do in the future. But, actually I dont know if it is
> 
> In general, you have to leave one instance (popping all artifacts as if going out
> to the Internet), and then enter the new instance.
> 
> It matters not if these are two RPLinstances (by instanceID), or two different
> LLNs seperated by the Internet.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
>