Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 04 September 2012 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F9021F862A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1lMtGGj1wBF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624021F8568 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so9833789iab.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IJElxxY9hB99ygOllY0pX+Bi9BusGyZwF4Ivd0WQnOM=; b=PG7RqCWW5kiMcmxJYdgTjzcw6vU2L9K5GezwUu3TnxYHLtN7JJrZv/SlaqHEFzAurp 5eYdo9Kv/2e8FCtJ5yMrqXjbN1nTeatwCXCoOw/cjJcVjFkx+mk0BwsPY5ApIlo4QHxC 9hRHASneLdrzN7IbUqtClAofjw2C8ojlrTx8vULxql33ePR1sKcC/9dl6LLR5lXVT8L8 HhdbWUW++sjbXhJ2WNbqr5BEtQegjy7RYNCvPERwDfeIhP57XNoRpMVIvLwgpSVyJjeg dtrPYd7T1iWYXZxufWvXL/+Q7qZNAkg+ZzM+UpdEfVG9JiPgGhRFzuUK7FmgAslYmjPE qt6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.41.169 with SMTP id g9mr13521945igl.4.1346753073261; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.38.130 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1EEC52C7-5B67-459D-A579-D809F5426BD0@cs.stanford.edu>
References: <CAErDfUQV2E5H66k9YjRSGF8RmA=xhQzrDwpyTRBJ8WQUZh3diw@mail.gmail.com> <B7828579-4864-4CBA-A999-808F394D543F@cisco.com> <BD04C41F-0368-4AEB-8E23-EA3043298599@etri.re.kr> <952CC507-2BA2-4005-B44A-0E40308E15AF@cisco.com> <1EEC52C7-5B67-459D-A579-D809F5426BD0@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_zVK=ueFQ9BRA2SQggUkrC32_Qvi0RTSmV4d4puwQVCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:04:34 -0000

Hi Philip,

I also think that RPL is complicated, for good reasons, but not always
complicated protocols should not be optimized or assisted by others.
However, new ideas and drafts are always recommended.

AB

On 9/3/12, Philip Levis <pal@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:06 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:
>
>>  Thanks for your feed-back, great discussion. If we have sufficient
>> requirements for such a case (let's see what the WG says)
>
> It seems like so far no one has presented a strong case; I'd argue that we
> should table it until it's needed. RPL is complicated enough already.
>
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>