Re: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sat, 11 April 2020 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABE33A1547 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=DSMipmeq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=JK5ds+AY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXODPQivQ4um for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F92D3A154B for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5561; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586623117; x=1587832717; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Fweyph+3IZtBITCO0xYMZHH8I81FRpzemS/cNLhNato=; b=DSMipmeqqLX8Og7ic5BbTTr7QQE6Hj49Tp3tAxl9tDB1FmdRZUzBkmtk 2e36XnMU4llVYnwPGN87XG5xT2whZHFGHyjxu6Q9pXWl4X/ouW8d5/Bzs sduJRzGvYbNIUn7IEg0QSPXMl79HK53cwgBhOCcgqFO6fNTKdG51vpuLh M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Aq5HEjxJ64yiiHAmEttmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4Z?= =?us-ascii?q?M7irVIN76u5InmIFeBvKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUg?= =?us-ascii?q?Mdz8AfngguGsmAXFXnLOPgYjYmNM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CpEAAO8pFe/5hdJa1mHQIBCRIFBYF?= =?us-ascii?q?8gSUvUAVsWCAECyqEHINGA4ppToFsJYEBkkGEYIJSA1QKAQEBDAEBGAEKCgI?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGERAIXgXkkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQECAQEBEBEdAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?sDA8CAQgEPgICAiULJQIEEyKCfwQBAYF+TQMOIAEOpH8CgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQE?= =?us-ascii?q?FgkiCPhiCDgMGgTiCYolTGoFBP4ERJwwQghg1PoJnAQGEdzKCLJEXhgqaMwq?= =?us-ascii?q?CQZdPHZwmrBkCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiDYFKcBU7KgGCPlAYDY0sAxeDUIUUhUF?= =?us-ascii?q?0gSmOLgEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,371,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="744300944"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Apr 2020 16:38:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03BGcIpJ003139 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:18 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:38:17 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:38:17 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:38:17 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=f9LpuVtila71mt354yPd8rlcAc9+e9vmgXVKco3lDf8U+sdF8D3oD+1gw8cFL4h2bm29ad7BAmExVtrpDvBGGAmwEXHdUMLVL4XiOB75bB79Q3pOArGxQWQnCu3QbxBj8o22LyyA4s5PCUkHFmBmS/RquZqtvIxtNer3xw5ll341QbEDmJXIeZesU2Of7eqDCUSHPVzbql55B8HbnyRxTmAyi7v6bFKafXtQ4eyJs0GLkPc/eL+xY3lhBMLLcRcnpKdnh7T541j+pAI4zrD9eP5Yn2IQeHH6amzooyYmNNrAM9ML1aanl7zqKa7XgZvFwL/BoRaDCm9Jg25tKrO31g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fweyph+3IZtBITCO0xYMZHH8I81FRpzemS/cNLhNato=; b=lj5rjWG0YEaXhNECHFJZ8sB1KP1YZd95KZ0L2NjWWsrNSDJItJEbr9y8xAfDq81bJZgWsgUfi85tegilyTgFjyhSfqYwqRok3AEvR7pz6VKe25HMLc1+jhZw4QigcByw2xgL2OdkE2K/udDQDUJTJSpM9fws9a/BOxUffjup++ERXaFhRc4VoIEY7iuJlO0xMwExSN4IIgPUQhT9Jl2Xx68kA1yJFBRmgaTmzFX0k6qpuIlT8odsayDdVDjl4oJDQkwzYBHzmiKJlA4/xAYDqB1bDGOIzty0KZxsMLTw76sEp5tpQySymDj3IZOOZVgxgOS9mXjwHS2NnlZW4+wyMw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fweyph+3IZtBITCO0xYMZHH8I81FRpzemS/cNLhNato=; b=JK5ds+AYZ0eOJY+jSGovzeV1IdD+Y41WkEu/88J4bJv6fKkmIx3AF7xZqAguoHs4So7B+IfLLfuNdKs0J9WUI/yil4pcw20z9MolsRr9eYf/7gAadf+m5VO6O+hI7PVXSaX6kHz2g4aG42DomyyHR3kD57Fxh1FgAz8QLcYZLfc=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::31) by MN2PR11MB4549.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:26d::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.20; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:13 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.018; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:13 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13
Thread-Index: AQHV/Ro9AOfHATbWbk+HyMb2raYz4qhtjAx3gAFYroCAAglh4IABNtCAgAAAwqCAAg64AIAAEJYD
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:13 +0000
Message-ID: <91157D69-4945-4FFD-A221-14702DA03868@cisco.com>
References: <CAP+sJUe7oF74F96zi5RuE985CD9LzNfwad=Zzstc8uat2wc3aQ@mail.gmail.com> <25495_1585151124_5E7B7C94_25495_267_1_DAA13A41.7291B%dominique.barthel@orange.com> <CAP+sJUchX+q_cX4_fOytz+q5RfjN+L51VM-+Auz4jVxK-6wpOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO0Djp1QGASEu4fasZD6K6CSD0q-7F+CD0_JOOppWnnABdbo5w@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35650537494AB9FB8E0849D1D8C10@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAO0Djp1-SYaYGwpdBsUbK07_HPN=Had_MqJidXfPg1fBM4wHPg@mail.gmail.com>, <MN2PR11MB3565A72C53705EEF21DAD237D8DF0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <BM1PR01MB40208D80481AD0AEC7F9746FA9DF0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BM1PR01MB40208D80481AD0AEC7F9746FA9DF0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:75d0:c387:5918:2ea1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 69dab0f5-1fa4-48ba-dc6d-08d7de36bac9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4549:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB45491CF8EBDCF5686740FC50D8DF0@MN2PR11MB4549.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03706074BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(376002)(6916009)(45080400002)(86362001)(6486002)(6512007)(76116006)(36756003)(966005)(5660300002)(8936002)(2906002)(33656002)(66574012)(478600001)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(316002)(8676002)(91956017)(81156014)(66446008)(186003)(71200400001)(2616005)(64756008)(6506007)(244885003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: P/9oJIE6qDbu8hGGNHMToy+167kPUTSmZ2tKZ8OrqZKH19pDk6plSKplLQTUPwo8fYYSNwriOozOTlS1pBAuCV+uAyt9HnawG+o8APZdfuWMIKQFS02NcgIpnZWAe99l+vHb/Nvi4f4kM+BKYH6DJXKqDFFo8kgM0IoD9uAmVPaaQxUAzgUYO+EIXHxt788WeAeM+ILDL0PWvyVKltiMnQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_91157D6949454FFDA22114702DA03868ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 69dab0f5-1fa4-48ba-dc6d-08d7de36bac9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Apr 2020 16:38:13.7337 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: REIifLTwU91sJ1rs8ehCHPO7/u7oN/xta5AIPPeodcknaS609uIIppeurGzQEr8qoiYl43+tocIk68KPym26Nw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4549
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Se-3rgvyqwzSIoupmN2-_QQIXFg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-13
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:38:47 -0000

Yes that was the proposal and yes the cost is high. Maybe we could MUST a knob to turn it on if it is not always?


Regards,

Pascal

Le 11 avr. 2020 à 17:39, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> a écrit :


I went through the diff and it seems ok to me. Thanks
Regarding ROVR, pls find my rsp inline.

>
> > 3) There is no mandate for using the ROVR in the target option. It is a SHOULD,
> should it be a MUST?
>
> [RJ] The ROVR will be a MUST only when a DAO for RUL is sent with a lifetime of
> zero by the 6LR. If this is what you mean then yes, I think it should be a MUST.

There will still be the case of a legacy node, to the Root will have to cope with no ROVR.
The text did not MUST on the termination because there is a proposed alternative of doing the EDAR exchange there.

SHOULD we MUST it all the time?

It is also useful to control the 6LBR, e.g., reduce the lifetime.
It is mostly protecting the future for more zerotrust security using the ROVR in RPL. We can work on that rapidly once the RUL work is complete. The cost is the extra bytes obviously.

[RJ] Sorry, but I am still not clear on the proposition here. Are you proposing that all the DAO target options MUST carry a ROVR field even in regular case? I understand that using ROVR might improve security in the future but the cost is high in my opinion.
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll