[Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update

Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> Fri, 13 April 2012 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4CF21F86F2 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.869
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9MSHPIJK0+P7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0508721F86D3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net []) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A0FA31CD for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F195D220513 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D62F1220512 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B176)
Message-Id: <CB3B8188-6E42-4996-BE18-D22220DFC172@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:25:39 -0700
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:24:58 -0000

Hello folks,

I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.

Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?

This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.



Thomas Heide Clausen

"Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
 discuss it."
   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees