Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P

>You aren't the only one who wants to read all the changes again.

I just wanted to mention that the changes are not that many or substantial in spite of the mailing list traffic we managed to generate. Most changes are basically textual clarifications.

Thanks
Mukul 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:35:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> writes:
    Thomas> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a
    Thomas> consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P. 

Yes, using a good threaded reader is a good idea.
The IETF lists are also http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.protocols.rpl
and you can access it via nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.protocols.rpl
with a usenet newsreader.

    Thomas> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to
    Thomas> ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the
    Thomas> I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be
    Thomas> given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the
    Thomas> ADs? 

I think that we will do this.
Once a new draft is complete, I will remind the list with a link to the
datatracker ID diff tool.

You aren't the only one who wants to read all the changes again.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll