[Roll] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)
Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 19 April 2021 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164253A36C9; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl@ietf.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.28.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <161884704906.8680.6192562844809236074@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:44:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/T_LhC29MgtEhgRiBFNHiFBh0Odo>
Subject: [Roll] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:44:09 -0000
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. I have some minor comments/questions below. Francesca 1. ----- Section 2. FP: Thank you for this very extensive (and useful) terminology section. I would suggest to add a sentence to say that the reader is expected to be familiar with RFC 6550 terminology. Alternatively, it might be good to add terms defined there and used in this document, such as DODAG and DODAGID, into this section as well. It also might improve readability to add references to documents when appropriate (for example, DIO could reference RFC 6550). 2. ----- to OrigNode. Intermediate routers join the Paired DODAGs based on the Rank as calculated from the DIO message. Henceforth in this FP: Please add a reference to where Rank is first defined, and/or add it to the terminology. 3. ----- Target Prefix / Address (variable-length field) An IPv6 destination address or prefix. The Prefix Length field contains the number of valid leading bits in the prefix. The length of the field is the least number of octets that can contain all of the bits of the Prefix, in other words Floor((7+(Prefix Length))/8) octets. The remaining bits in FP: "Floor((7+(Prefix Length))/8)" I am not sure where the "7+" comes from. Noting that the Prefix Length is 7-bit long, I am tempted to say that the number of octets calculated here also includes Prefix Length, however that is not clear from the sentence above ("The length of the field" - I assume the field refers to the Target Prefix / Address only). I think some clarification is necessary.
- [Roll] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draf… Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on … Charles Perkins