Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"

"Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw)" <pwetterw@cisco.com> Thu, 25 August 2016 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <pwetterw@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B0912D186 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUnS9rWHJltG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE9C12D105 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2206; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472117894; x=1473327494; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8zWfr9jQwUjFppbj9RkX7XbfrwWDzgeGXNWY5DfWLQc=; b=J5dRgqlDi1csiFGHaetGiT9S3afuep5+lTKkyzqhlPgsG63d+sEIzU+2 t7lkowDRHiT8AveFp8zkl8NlH0+lnYK89+ZY1e71I6HiLjM26uoMizGqd bf4k2meHNNm6fFMxzqF4a68SCptWMNRYy47y9VWKdGTQBk4TWSs3Gbin5 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgDZu75X/4UNJK1cgykBAQEBAR5WfAe4FYF+JIV5AhyBNTgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQUBASEROhsCAQgaAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQTiDIOsRWPaAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZBYEDhSuBeIJVhCYaF4JrK4IvBYg5hx+JcgGPJYFthF2JB0iLeYN4AR42gWlfgTVwhgJ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,575,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="314340693"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Aug 2016 09:38:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7P9cDqw022287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:38:14 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:38:13 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-014.cisco.com ([64.101.220.154]) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com ([64.101.220.154]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:38:13 -0400
From: "Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw)" <pwetterw@cisco.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"
Thread-Index: AQHR/rRm6Z8sBnV1bUaAVU2Xlt5Ufw==
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:38:13 +0000
Message-ID: <A9F30694-ABD8-4EB7-A681-7D155B8A09CF@cisco.com>
References: <5ac3960df196482c01fc272d9164012a@xs4all.nl> <5795E3B9.4000802@ericsson.com> <50d0bcdd18ff300aaf1e183f6751c492@xs4all.nl> <5795F37C.1050303@ericsson.com> <7aff23749031ebe9e839e0aa9ac3c1db@xs4all.nl> <9b78090fa7c3a958fac60b5759659220@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <9b78090fa7c3a958fac60b5759659220@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.15.1.160411
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.216.12]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B3CE4679039F8A489EBA2A2EAAA3C329@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Ug_DUMctUoIO-L1WuLJfEHICsdg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:38:16 -0000

Dear all,

I support the work on DAO projection and would be willing to review it.

This will bring value to a RPL based network.

Many thanks,

Patrick




On 12/08/16 08:49, "Roll on behalf of peter van der Stok" <roll-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
>opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the
>last set of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will
>be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.
>
>Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
>
>
>  F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
>      Root initiated routing state in RPL
>
>•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
>•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
>
>
>  G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
>        Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
>
>  •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>  •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
>  •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>  •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
>
>
>It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the
>drafts
>
>
>Thank you very much,
>
>
>  Peter and Ines
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Roll mailing list
>Roll@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll