IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A36120921 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:46:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXBaCxj1jhJb for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AEC120C1F for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id c25so13869013vsp.0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:46:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5/NOPApTRBwaTyKRKxGXQ971H1BIppWdjiLNMsXtY7U=; b=iXrjCS/VvmARhC2muBhlUCgylg08GFP23A2qfCH6fB1BYSTHGVV0lygnW5Vl2KV9AU 5SCSuOERptjznJ8nYaAnfWqVtIgUiz9q5gBfpeIbByi57xZequdc+E2iu8eWYF+2f/qG /WZqkek/QaNqvmuC9SQqEwzaaG4iYAxPet8jUAwsCXPWr8UvNkjZA85gu5J4yWiuC1eG iP1iJEdMOErTg6kHZX5KCoEpLbZhlyTCxyz+WrniOz3eYKUJodM9ixDoh6umVf4sxtMF o8r6K3DxRJ21prMfgVhPfM0J5FCD3HhIB/snXyIawgXT4PsHhdq/KXWjtuNyRe7BFamu pBDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5/NOPApTRBwaTyKRKxGXQ971H1BIppWdjiLNMsXtY7U=; b=MIWR3azd+s1Afk1R+nqT2gZ7U6pDzC5gSKj2J4OaFJDVBmYOt99a74J9wre+b+dzLB H37w1FgCli2CeL+w9IjAmqpo7twcpFYOXfzRualJlBg9MNB1fqhKaGMcGfPpji/P3GH6 EtV+CwgNiiWq1YfVQNb3tdJSHDdPNEvEgICBUCn1/KvxtT6EQsf6c4YyQfR94dVRgNKM pLUbWBHmv00czGtxnulv/+oMxib8aen5/QhPwmt2IpWj0GyuxgSaOXzBX80mZutXSuRL mQ2oQeM3wHEc/a2xFNU3c7LEDRafFlFV5Lf94ywjpgJOQxgt4/89zcI8QyxZhkXsABCW Dj/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9aRN5jS40o8mH0ZyUDQsIt1g0dneUPN+DGSgMdiZHFy6Q8vkT olt76IcdTl8dMw35MHrA38cDG0cRrHgWEohS4xoay9UIFYY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqdRR2wcqDO9M9OVUSBNNW86tNbhID+R411urxTD2HzxOSLhFrqi+ZmrO1DJ9xmAflQKI6PgsW+X1qsT2RIog=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f708:: with SMTP id m8mr21370410vso.173.1574160369293; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:46:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:45:58 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp20PRZnzTO4pU0KPmiCPcdEiitJYLdoLWOmOkgj6-vzmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/V4jXrd8fRzctxvGhI9Uahy6KHBw>
Subject: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:46:15 -0000

Hello All,

During IETF106 we discussed splitting up MOPex and capabilities,
reasons have been:
1. MOPex and capabilities are not dependent on each other
2. Capabilities draft may take a while for WGLC, while MOPex can be
shipped sooner.

Please let us know of your opinions.

The following is the link for the separated draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jadhav-roll-mopex/

Reviews are highly appreciated.

Thanks,
Rahul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email