[Roll] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 20 April 2021 22:03 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietf.org
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AE53A1F1F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl@ietf.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.28.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <161895622802.25938.15008636103702222386@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:03:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/VhLp__JvUArl8BTVyEluCElUkp4>
Subject: [Roll] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:03:55 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Firstly, thank you for writing this - I'm really not a ROLL person, but I found it interesting... I support John and Rob's DISCUSSes, but I'll let them carry the heavy load :-) I have a few nits: Section 4.3: 'r A one-bit reserved field. This field MUST be initialized to zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.' I could find no 'r' in Figure 3 - did you mean 'X'? Section 6.2.1, Step 1: 'If the S bit in the received RREQ-DIO is set to 0, the router MUST determine into the upward direction (towards the OrigNode) of the link.' I was unable to parse this. More worryingly, I was also not able to figure out what it should say... Section 6.3.1: 'default to 1/4 of the time duration determined by the L bit.' - s/L bit/L value'. This says that the default of 1/4 of the time duration, but I didn't see where /why the default would change. Also, isn't 'time' in 'time duration' unnecessary? Duration implies time. Appendix A: 'The combination of Received Signal Strength Indication(downstream) (RSSI) and Expected Number of Transmissions(upstream)" (ETX) ' -- this is a random closing quote without an opening one.
- [Roll] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf… Warren Kumari via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-… Charles Perkins