IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] About merging two RFC drafts: draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority and DODAG size

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2021 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0793C3A13D9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:09:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=RHeIL/aH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=hfYx+aBR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxdNHA02xriB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850FF3A138C for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:09:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1272; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1612544995; x=1613754595; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MQT5YNEdHkXbND/nYMBL6cxRb7FZ3AEQkL/5n/4iVaA=; b=RHeIL/aHAWw92mwEAgrVSA1HW80PQT4Qj26nKikhl5lnQjgyfTWccpkb Ny/xPqmbUsWxiO3KWifLdqvKHQk9INTrEiSpc/jCSG15X5XOrlv0ixdOq 3V778I/2ZBqNzCFd9gbsrc0gIFD2pwD6fOfBxBw4jvXyJ3bO3vzHTU7Au Y=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0A4AAAweh1gmIMNJK1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIE8BwELAYFSKSh9WjYxiAgDjhGREYgLgS4UgREDVAsBAQENAQEnBgIEAQGESwKCAAIlNQgOAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBAQGGNg2FdAMDJxMGAQE3AQ8CAQg2EDIlAgQBDQ2DHgGCVQMuAQ6lWgKKJXSBATODBQEBBoEzAYNzGIISAwaBOAGCdopMJhuBQT+BEUOCVj6CXQKBJTyDS4IsgmEMQQQiGRiBGDSBKLkRCoJ6iTaJf4hwgy6KRpUuhH2PNYsrkXuEUAICAgIEBQIOAQEGgVgBNYFZcBWDJFAXAg2OIRodbgEHCAeCNYpZdAssAgYKAQEDCXyLGQEB
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:XgPV/BKvQgYs8200MdmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeGvKk/h17SVoKd4PVB2KLasKHlDGoH55vJ8HUPa4dFWBJNj8IK1xchD8iIBQyeTrbqYiU2Ed4EWApj+He2YkNUA835IVbVpy764TsbAB6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1KUC9rB7asY8dho4xJw==3D
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,155,1610409600"; d="scan'208";a="641919918"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 Feb 2021 17:09:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 115H9stU000650 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:09:54 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:09:54 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:09:53 -0600
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:09:53 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JCGvmP3qWJBj6vCub9VzZ1p9D1WjdYiKcgf2bFo/o8WrBVNLEz+e4k4KtCm8mwev7R9dTjQhLoVi7WpGo9HFkgmqWWLohi7DLK5AHKKUiN+6ch/++VAlv72Oy8MLR4HNSkTufjNB6xgcQHcDDQg6BQXeUADPNoF+bfgjqrYjeIoDMHsNnW/5ls19ShQevqiUfcznSOROT9dYX3s7MWdd/6Bv+WCwPx74PFCGzFIjSCDMS4ZDS3OAefsSYeaAMGUdZK7FRD2vglTvi80qFiC9OZAIZoTZSbXOL7ndrUBz1XovQywyKmj/VRVDu2/6YIUI76DkFiHPmpr9ckYVfT+Vrw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MQT5YNEdHkXbND/nYMBL6cxRb7FZ3AEQkL/5n/4iVaA=; b=R/Nh3IBNlyxYOJA3jm6BBBfgshW8GPB+gU05X7Rwkgs3l/WO6ARISEU+hwTYmeZUyXGSsRJAcowHJLpXpTfv1Kwk8cOTcT8PLFo4Y/ZebOt2pJpDIAEVGksqqIsVP73I76xkMbvP6ftksu7uuHJ2RlzERGXTlasU8ZLf7kZNUwUvTKgr23j81tzevxFJ23XeqJl4AQf8hnhSSeI1SJ8wmEl8Wa8bXeVpsuU/aeHQTiRLWoXym0UWR1RQy3FRXiOfzK8vG3j09oqzD/0Fph+zq4A+skA9tg7pPbOgPbAu5zRn2Vpaui1D2By/88O/yHbesLqEBZxXk7mcFyZ05+wQBA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MQT5YNEdHkXbND/nYMBL6cxRb7FZ3AEQkL/5n/4iVaA=; b=hfYx+aBREITCGiZIRE6CEh89F7D5CZIjfNtjU6NyOUL0+2iVQ6Vg7uetKScSGPJ+OfcGOd5a1CpptRwLhiWZgujq1ToNmJ47sqeA+mJG4o3IcUo5to6ohhOtvHKdwRppP7LCL2V9Ei2cJo+M2riSLCpDZW8mrZ8diV3oYG5ADAI=
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:91::20) by CO1PR11MB5153.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:95::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3825.23; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:09:52 +0000
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::14a1:29eb:e708:d7e6]) by CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::14a1:29eb:e708:d7e6%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3805.025; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:09:52 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "Huimin She (hushe)" <hushe@cisco.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, "rahul.ietf@gmail.com" <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About merging two RFC drafts: draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority and DODAG size
Thread-Index: AQHW+tnW4nSwmAqnH0OPpMU1bjMGq6pHwixQgABpFYCAAYylAA==
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 17:09:40 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:00:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4881B45B84DEEAB6F51E811AD8B29@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <53213D6A-2693-4E6F-98D7-93B9C32826E2@cisco.com> <CO1PR11MB488127E6CC71362E8BE2E205D8B39@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <28613.1612455125@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <28613.1612455125@localhost>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:4d9a:7dcd:b182:da4c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3386201c-21fe-4e56-adf7-08d8c9f8da2c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO1PR11MB5153:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR11MB5153C0618A4B57CC9201B4A4D8B29@CO1PR11MB5153.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4303;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(5660300002)(186003)(316002)(76116006)(66556008)(4744005)(83380400001)(6506007)(66446008)(64756008)(66476007)(66946007)(7696005)(6666004)(478600001)(966005)(8676002)(71200400001)(4326008)(110136005)(2906002)(52536014)(33656002)(86362001)(8936002)(55016002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3386201c-21fe-4e56-adf7-08d8c9f8da2c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Feb 2021 17:09:52.1482 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: r9FEJgFdpgoDb+kdMAXVtLelOfa7me6Fn8512jh4Q7XqMeC3b0G5KnEf2n6UZboikIiWqTtk0Ls4+cBNP22aTA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR11MB5153
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Wm56Hkmz7XyPqAfR-WnamMs_dKY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] About merging two RFC drafts: draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority and DODAG size
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 17:10:03 -0000

Dear all 

As agreed at the interim, I pushed some changes in the draft to add the DODAG Size to the new option.

I leave the ball to Huimin to take more of his original work and complete the changes.

My own diffset is here 
https://github.com/roll-wg/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/commit/e3d3d0b57ba6339b292718670ae4332730ffb03d

for now I commented out 
<!--  
It may also be added by a router on part of the sub-tree as a result of some (out of scope for this document) management function.
6LRs that see this DIO Option SHOULD increment their minimum enrollment priority if they observe congestion on the channel used for enrollment traffic.
The exact mechanism is a local decision, and may be the subject for future work.
-->

I'm concerned that the undocumented/future behavior will create comments at the IESG. 
My observation is that we should either define the process fully or not mention it at all.
Also, the common practice for DIO values that they are set by the Root and propagated unchanged seems relevant here to start with, so I reworded the github text in that direction.

Please feel free to comment / contradict, it's easy to roll back any of the above.

Keep safe;

Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email