Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

[Ines Robles <[e-mail]>]

Great! Thank you! :)

On 03/23/2016 04:39 AM, Gabriel Montenegro wrote:
> Michael Richardson volunteered (cc-ed).
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ines Robles [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 19:26
>> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]; Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
>> <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to
>> ROLL
>>
>> Hi Pascal,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment. it makes sense.
>>
>> Does this document has a shepherd assigned? Someone volunteer :-)? It will be
>> nice to have new people of WGs involved in this task.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Peter and Ines.
>>
>>
>> On 03/22/2016 03:57 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
>>> Hello Ines,
>>>
>>> I think the draft is ripe for last call.
>>>
>>> We have spent all the cycles in the 6lo WG and the work is done, upon
>> validation of the ROLL team. Last call is an excellent way of validating that.
>>> Could you please consider launching it? 6lo just did for the paging dispatch,
>> and doing it now means that we can announce the result in Buenos Aires.
>>> Take care,
>>>
>>> Pascal
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ines Robles [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>> Sent: lundi 21 mars 2016 22:09
>>>> To: [e-mail]; Routing Over Low power and Lossy
>>>> networks <[e-mail]>
>>>> Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[e-mail]>;
>>>> [e-mail];
>>>> [e-mail]; Michael Richardson
>>>> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Suresh Krishnan
>>>> <[e-mail]>; draft-ietf-6lo-paging-
>>>> [e-mail]; Gabriel Montenegro
>>>> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from
>>>> 6LO to ROLL
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 03/21/2016 09:44 AM, peter van der Stok wrote:
>>>>> Happy to collaborate, but still dependent on Ines point of view.
>>>> It is ok for me, Pascal just submitted the new version. :)
>>>>> I would suggest that I-D is submitted as ietf-roll-.
>>>>> That does not need to take time; only the existing draft with a new
>>>>> draft identifier.
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer to start WGLC during the meeting in B-A, having explained
>>>>> the situation.
>>>> Yes, we can start the WGLC on monday 4th.
>>>>> Anything I am overlooking?
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>> Brian Haberman schreef op 2016-03-19 00:13:
>>>>>> Works for me as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Brian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana)
>>>>>>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That works for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alvaro.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thumb-typed and autocorrected..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Michael Richardson
>>>>>>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done
>>>>>>>>> and happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL
>>>>>>>>> perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to
>>>>>>>>> RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel
>>>>>>>>> the consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate
>>>>>>>>> the last call to ROLL?
>>>>>>>> I think that would suffice, if ADs approve.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fww
>>>>>>
>> w.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2froll&data=01%7c01%7cGabriel.Monte
>> negro%40microsoft.com%7c0e636663df984b261bce08d352c29efc%7c72f988
>> bf
>> 86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=FzPpD0yJbEDSStuSXJqUAO6l3Rv3x8
>> U0
>>>>>> %2borDMFs1pgg%3d