IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 12 May 2017 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B719012422F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 May 2017 06:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1-REpcksTIhC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 May 2017 06:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B047D127369 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 06:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5406CE1D7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 09:47:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D6B636BB for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 09:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <486101F3-020B-4D40-B4F9-1B6A698C0018@gmail.com>
References: <6352.1494433492@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <D5388F92.3AF0C%d.sturek@att.net> <21405.1494505912@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <486101F3-020B-4D40-B4F9-1B6A698C0018@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:21:21 -0400
Message-ID: <30237.1494595281@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/XqDr_K8rzydf_TaFBiVWM3Nn6wQ>
Subject: Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 13:26:06 -0000

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > case. Also the tabular view for header changes is also repeatative in
    > some case (raf to root flow for e.g.). Not sure if the table view for
    > header manipulation for storing, non storing be merged easily for all
    > cases with good readability.

The tables are hard to maintain/update.
Should we even keep them?
on the other hand, they are already done.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email