IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Dissenting technical arguments unwelcome (was: Re: trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local)

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Thu, 25 July 2013 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D292F21F936F; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qaMOPX7WBYbB; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF53621F9346; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6PKC7VN019500; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:12:07 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r6PKC7VN019500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1374783127; bh=BOAf2BlHtRpeD3i7YDjbcqeVhGQ=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=z5zeGdaEAmo69UgXtTzd5kXPhaL2drV0uTYmvbEdtYSPrlo+HB3mAKo3miDYpPriP YtdkRqWuO4aTLoA/2ddn0PuJII8+Z15QZVIDE+7jzSuHJmJdlpf7A+oygBWsV97G0G 50scel5fudK9PyyrdgCeEjGuVYLU0NJnq3ZlJ+A4=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p6OLC70544563261bH ret-id none; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:12:07 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6PKBgWV005555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:11:43 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CE16B454.225BD%d.sturek@att.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:11:45 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|c037c5b28ff64fed2dc2f655ee9cafeep6OLC703tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|1896F191-4448-41AF-BC56-E643371BCC4E@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CE16B454.225BD%d.sturek@att.net> <1896F191-4448-41AF-BC56-E643371BCC4E@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p6OLC7054456326100; tid=p6OLC70544563261bH; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=3:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r6PKC7VN019500
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:41:03 -0700
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Dissenting technical arguments unwelcome (was: Re: trickle-mcast-04 - Clarify scope value of 3 - subnet-local)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:12:16 -0000

On 25 Jul 2013, at 19:03, Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:

> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> Let me say as an implementer of ROLL RPL (and Trickle Multicast) the topic
> of multi-link subnets and the general topic of multicast address scope
> continues to be a major concern.  For example, we needed to extend mDNS to
> cover site specific addressing for this reason as well as need to define
> another draft describing ULA prefix delegation rules and forwarding rules
> for border routers (yet to be done).

Hi,

It would be great to get requirements for this - hopefully this can be raised in the dnssdext BoF next week, and contributed into the draft-lynn-mdnsext-requirements-02 work by Kerry and Stuart. Currently the dnssdext charter includes this use case.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email